AutomationHQ vs. BlazeMeter

AutomationHQ

AutomationHQ

1 Reviews and Ratings

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

25 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
AutomationHQ	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	AutomationHQ™ (AHQ) is a complete TAAS (Test Automation As Service) solution. Its NLP driven, cloud-based No-Code test automation platform is presented as ideal for agile delivery team. Any one in agile team can develop In-Sprint test automation in plain English with AHQ. User can create virtual test robots in AHQ and assign test scripts to them. These test robots works as virtual testers for the agile team. TestBots can be executed on…	$69 per month Organisation
BlazeMeter	Score 8.1 out of 10	N/A	The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.	$149 per month

Pricing

AutomationHQ

BlazeMeter

Editions & Modules

Startup & E-commerce Package: $69
per month Organisation

Basic: $149.00
per month
Pro: $649.00
per month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Considered Both Products	AutomationHQ Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Chose AutomationHQ Automation Anywhere and Automation Anywhere IQ Bot Incentivized Helpful?	BlazeMeter Verified User Anonymous Chose BlazeMeter BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlazeMeter In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlazeMeter BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BlazeMeter Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	AutomationHQ	BlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend	The AutomationHQ tool is well suited for small to medium size projects, but sometimes there is difficulty in the case of complex elements which are present within multiple Iframes. Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	The best thing I liked about AutomationHQ is that it intelligently identify web elements and track changes in real-time applications It supports Data driven testing from mainly three data sources from Excel/XML/JSON There are myriad pre-build test steps, which we can use to built our own scripts. Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started. Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	AutomationHQ doesn’t have test cases version control, we have to currently manually do this by copying the test script and [renaming] with the version. I wish AHQ can implement the version control so I don’t have to keep test script copies Complex elements like within multiple iframes have difficulty at run time. It seems we have to run it multiple time until AHQ's AI algorithm "learn" what is the right way Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	It required good knowledge to analyze BlazeMeter report. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	We have received gains for about 150% over a long period of time Vishvesh Khandpur Quality Assurance Tester Read full review	BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously. BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users. BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	AutomationHQ Screenshots