AutomationNG vs. Digital.ai TeamForge

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AutomationNG
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Indecomm Global Services headquartered in New Jersey offers AutomationNG, a test automation and test management platform.N/A
Digital.ai TeamForge
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…N/A
Pricing
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Features
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
AutomationNG
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Centralized test management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Defect management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomationNGDigital.ai TeamForge
Likelihood to Recommend
AutomationNG is best suited for people with no programming language at all. It is easy to write tests and execute. Cross browser testing feature is the best part of this app. Cross browser testing can be tricky in other tools, but this app handles it very graciously. However, the tests are executed slowly compared to other tools like selenium but that requires programming knowledge
Read full review
As long as you are looking for a tool that segregates who can do what with a given repository and branch in GIT, and do not mind strictly using TeamForge's Agile tracking software that comes native to the application, this is the tool for you. The tool is fairly user-friendly, and they have an excellent support staff. You're really buying that support, more than anything else. If however, your company insists on using separated agile tracking software such as Version One, I would not recommend TeamForge. They prefer an all or nothing kind of deal.
Read full review
Pros
  • Doesnt require any programming knowledge
  • Test cases are written in simple English-like
  • Cross browser testing is supported and is easy to perform
  • Integration with Jira
  • Takes significantly less time to write test scripts
Read full review
  • Code security.
  • Code migration.
  • Agile tie-in.
Read full review
Cons
  • UI is pretty outdated and needs major revamp
  • Test results UI can be improved
  • Speed of automation can be improved
Read full review
  • I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
  • I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
  • I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Easy to write the test cases hence saves lot of time.
  • Helps us to manage the tests and identify bugs quite early
  • Cross browser testing is a major feature
Read full review
  • CollabNet TeamForge has had a positive impact on the efficiency and productivity of managing and completing projects from specifications to software enhancements and from production issues/defects to bug fixes.
  • As a developer, CollabNet TeamForge allows me to focus more on delivering projects accurately and timely while maintaining communications with the business.
  • CollabNet TeamForge Is an efficiency life-cycle management product that helps my team meet business objectives by quickly delivering quality software, documenting projects in a smart and organized way and updating project status to senior management.
  • CollabNet TeamForge Subversion meets developers needs for change management and improves overall software development process in all phases of software lifecycle.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Digital.ai TeamForge Screenshots

Screenshot of TeamForge OverviewScreenshot of TeamForge Reporting DashboardScreenshot of Chef Deployment TraceabilityScreenshot of Defects Trend Report