Automox vs. LogMeIn Resolve

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management solution used to keep desktops, laptops, and servers updated and ready for users anywhere in the world. Using automation, IT can fix critical vulnerabilities and boost user productivity.N/A
LogMeIn Resolve
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
LogMeIn Resolve is an IT management and support solution designed to help organizations take control of their IT infrastructure. The platform combines features like remote monitoring, access, and support with tools such as ticketing, AI-assisted task automation, and patch management.
$29
per month
Pricing
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Remote Access
$29
per month
Remote Support Plus
$55
per month
Standard Endpoint Management
$70
per month
Premium Endpoint Management
$78
per month
Premium
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.Discount available for annual pricing. MDM is available as a standalone or as an add-on. Additional endpoints and agents and save up to 20%
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Considered Both Products
Automox
Chose Automox
worklegs are more advance on Automox, and the reports on Automox give you more detail information, the patching support is better on Automox, Atera can be simple but effective. However, Automox is a more efficient tool and like said before, better for large counts of devices. …
Chose Automox
We felt that Automox provided us with the functionality our MSP offered, including OS and device patching, as well as remote control capabilities, but in a better and more manageable way. We also felt the usability of the tool gave us the ability to be effective in our way of …
Chose Automox
TeamViewer excels in remote support, but lacks in patch management. Automox's patch management is reliable and stable.
Chose Automox
Automox has a much better user interface. Much simpler to use and share tasks with other team members. They offer great additional training and certifications to help you become an expert.
Chose Automox
We chose Automox for it's clean/easy to use UI, remote control capabilities, and automation/patching. The balance of effectiveness and cost made it the best choice for our org
Chose Automox
While not a direct analog, we have noted that our A/V provider also handles patching. That being said, the solution is not as al la carte as Automox, and requires much more thought to implement. Automox is a favorite for its lightweight nature and it's time to implementation …
Chose Automox
All of these other products are overly complicated with user interfaces that are not very friendly.. too technical, even for IT pros. They are also expensive for smaller companies or those with limited IT budgets. I've found that these other solutions are really geared for …
Chose Automox
Automox has a could based console and platform which can cater the computers outside the network. It's not possible in Lan Guard. Also Automox support cross platform and have a very big 3rd party application support than intune. So better to go with Automox
Chose Automox
We just really liked the ease of use and setup for Automox over other products in general. Support is amazing as well.
Chose Automox
Cloud-based solution with no need for on-prem infrastructure. Support Windows, macOS, Linux, and third-party applications. Cost-effective solution compared with other vendors.
Chose Automox
Compared to these solutions, Automox outranks them as the Automox is highly personalized for different types of device types. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS devices very effectively. Other products are also support other types of devices, but not this much of control can …
Chose Automox
Automox is by far the easiest to use and does a better job patching. The built in AI tool is a real time saver making writing Powershell scripts quick and easy.
Chose Automox
AutoMox is the first product I have tried for app updates, and I don't think I need to try any others.
Chose Automox
Don't remember the specific products as this was done by the whole team. But once we started evaluating Automox, it was definitely the product.
Chose Automox
Automox is cloud-based which makes it a much better product in todays world.
Chose Automox
NinjaONE does really well as an RMM. They are still a baby in patching, but they are growing rapidly. Qualys for patching is a little complicated to use. You actually need to be certified with them to comfortably use it. Their support is a little bit hard to work with.
Chose Automox
I didn't like any of them vs Automox just liked it the momement I started using it. I think we were one of the early adopters of Automox
LogMeIn Resolve
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Since ability to control a remote computer was removed from GoToMeeting, Resolve is only LogMeIn product that meets my needs.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
LogMeln has one-stop solutions and reduces multiple tool needs. Integrations with 3rd party tools like Teams & Outlook.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
We looked at several alternatives but due to are small size we were not able to use their services. ConnectWise, AnyDesk, ect
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
It is better in every way. Intuitively designed, great UI, easy to install and go live, great out of box training videos and features are constantly being improved and supported
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Teamviewer is a lot simpler and quicker to use.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
LogMeIn Resolve represents a distilled and clean RMM and ticket management system. Autotask has a lot of great features that might be unnecessary for a smaller organization's internal use. Sometimes a team just needs to get in and have that higher overview without setting up a …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
At the time that we tested and selected a remote access tool, GoTo was superior to the other options tested. Then came the issues with ctrl+key and shift+key combos which detracted from all of the things that made GoTo the best option. Until these are fixed GoTo will remain …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
LogMeIn Resolve has a much cleaner interface to organize assets and initiate support sessions than other platforms used in the past.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
We choose GoTo Resolve over Anydesk due to attractive pricing and All-in-one IT support feature.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
We traditionally utilize all related products to support our end users in a remote environment. This requires that we have access to their systems, typically monitored, via a screen share session where we can use built in functionality such as file sharing. This allows us to …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
GoTo resolve is less costly but not as feature based.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Go to offer all-in-one functionalities without compromising organizational security and policy. Go-to is versatile compared to other systems like JIRA and is suitable for medium organizations. It has all the support options required. Like web meetings, conversational ticketing, …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
GoTo Resolve has more features that are easier to use.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
GoTo Resolve is not necessarily an app that I personally chose to use in my organization; this is just one of many that I have interacted with and experienced through the different organizations that I have worked at over the years. However, I will say that I enjoy the engaging …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Intune does not have remote desktop. Intune also does not do 3rd party patching very well. Manage Engine Desktop Central requires a VPN Client to access the remote clients. It also requires quite a bit of configuration to work well. GoTo Resolve is the most complete tool I …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
In NinjaOne, The ticketing system may benefit from additional features like the option to use a custom domain for the support email address, as it is currently rather basic. Additionally, it has issues with correctly displaying photos, either not showing up at all or removing …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
ServiceNow is robust and highly scalable, often favored by larger enterprises, while Zendesk and Freshservice offer user-friendly interfaces and customizable workflows that cater to smaller to mid-sized businesses.
Now, comparing GoTo Resolve to these platforms, it stands out …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Most friendly in the usage, and most detailed information.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
It's one of the tool which can function in the same lines like above tools and is user friendly and cost effective
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
GoTo Resolve allowed us to consolidate our product suite in half, saving us nearly 80% of the cost annually. While there are certain features that felt smoother with their other products, such as the file transfer simplicity found with GoTo Assist... those small road bumps are …
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
Transferring large files using TeamViewer is practically impossible. During unstable internet connectivity, GoTo Resolve behaves fairly well when compared to TeamViewer.
Chose LogMeIn Resolve
As GoTo Resolve gives all in one package and its more user friendly hence it was chosen.
Best Alternatives
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxLogMeIn Resolve
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox is well-suited for managing workstations but lacks flexibility for server environments.
It excels in scenarios where systems may not regularly connect to the corporate network but have internet access, ensuring devices can still check in and receive timely patches. This provides organizations with confidence in maintaining patch compliance across remote endpoints.
However, effective use of Automox requires staff who are proficient in PowerShell scripting. The platform has limited native support for third-party applications, often requiring custom worklets to manage software updates. It performs best in environments that primarily rely on widely used, off-the-shelf software.
Read full review
I don't think I have ever encountered a scenario where LogMeIn is inappropriate. I work directly with customers 80% of the time, and even when I need to help a fellow IT professional out, LogMeIn is my go-to option. Viewing and reviewing all the units I manage is very helpful; it saves me a lot of time, especially after the frequent long-term power outages (where it surpasses the USP's protection) we often experience in our area.
Read full review
Pros
  • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
  • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
  • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
  • All the great information provided within one single device
Read full review
  • The summary of the pending tickets and how long are they due.
  • Graphical representation of the tickets section wise.
  • Performance review at glance of the action owners.
  • Excel export of the report.
  • It helps in planning and utilizing the resources.
  • The notification of the update via email.
Read full review
Cons
  • I was not aware that the starting default policies are inactive until I activate them. That would have been a nice pop up to see on first login.
  • I think the pricing for integrating 3rd party apps could be more competitive. The base tier is so affordable, the jump up is a bit high.
  • I'd like the option to remember my device and not have to use 2FA on every single login to the dashboard from the same device.
  • I looked, and cannot find, but would appreciate an iOS mobile app of the dashboard to monitor and adminstrate from my mobile device.
Read full review
  • It would be nice to have a one-click launch capability. There are times when walking through a user who isn't experienced that they have a hard time launching the program.
  • A batch file that launches a network connection and the program at the same time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
This is a software that just works. Once configured its a set and forget kind of tool that keeps things up to date and alerts me if something is wrong. I was able to work through an expansion project to deploy an additional 500 devices in almost no time and create a robust self-patching environment.
Read full review
To us, it just works. and it is what our users are comfortable with. It covers all the remote issues that we as an IT department encounter. We have grown to like it and we also have grown to like the Citrix product family. We really can't find anything that would keep us from renewing.
Read full review
Usability
It is super simple to set up and deploy, Maintaining it also easy as pie. It gives great detailed information daily on patches that succeed and ones that fail as well. with remote, patching, scanning, and monitoring all in one pane it has saved us money hand over fist with the tools we no longer need to have for our organization.
Read full review
From a receiving perspective, this software has been really easy to use. There is also the capability to have mobile device management so this is applicable to a variety of platforms and devices that may need troubleshooting. The reason I am not rating it a full 10 points is because I notice the lag time for the mouse is a little delayed on a consistent basis.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Usually available without a problem, although sometimes calls get dropped or users sit in empty meeting rooms while waiting for an admin to arrive, while the call is actually going on.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
If you are connected to someone with proper bandwidth, there are no issues at all. With all things, if you connect to someone with dial-up (yes, it still exists), the performance is terrible.
Read full review
Support Rating
1. Simplicity and Ease of Use 2. Cross-Platform Support 3. Powerful Automation with Worklets 4. Real-Time Visibility and Control 5. Fast and Reliable Cloud-Based Updates 6. Strong Security Focus
Read full review
The software runs well overall once installed. It is easy to use and very intuitive from both the technician standpoint and the customer standpoint. There are not a lot of problems or issues with the software, and it doesn't have a big effect on system resources once installed, or when running. It would not be a 10 since the cost of the licensing is one drawback
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
we did not have in person training
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
n/a - wasnt in attendance
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
Read full review
GoToAssist SeeIt was very easy to implement. As long as your techs have a basic understanding of most remote support tools they will be able to understand this product easily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We felt that Automox provided us with the functionality our MSP offered, including OS and device patching, as well as remote control capabilities, but in a better and more manageable way. We also felt the usability of the tool gave us the ability to be effective in our way of working, as well as integrating with Rapid7 was a massive benefit for us.
Read full review
At the time that we tested and selected a remote access tool, GoTo was superior to the other options tested. Then came the issues with ctrl+key and shift+key combos which detracted from all of the things that made GoTo the best option. Until these are fixed GoTo will remain inferior in functionality compared to other options where these items work the same as they do in Windows.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The system was implemented quite quickly and easily.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Being a start up, we have pivoted our strategies a number of times. The pay as you go model has worked very well for us, and has prevented us from overprovisioning
  • The time saved pulling reports to provide to auditors has been well worth our small spend on the solution
  • We have no need to maintain a scanning tool or invest in hardware thanks to the SaaS nature of Automox
Read full review
  • LogMeIn Resolve has increased productivity for our support teams with the addition of camera share. Not only are we able to remote into workstations, but with camera share we can utilize end user and customer phones to visually see physical setups to troubleshoot some situations on the fly.
  • Unattended support now requires the agent to enter in a signature key as an extra layer of security before accessing a device, which further improves the safety of all devices registered for unattended.
Read full review
ScreenShots

LogMeIn Resolve Screenshots

Screenshot of LogMeIn Resolve Device QuickviewScreenshot of LogMeIn Resolve - DevicesScreenshot of LogMeIn Resolve - Guided Agent FlowScreenshot of LogMeIn Resolve MS Teams TicketingScreenshot of LogMeIn Resolve Support SessionScreenshot of LogMeIn Resolve Tickets Board