TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Automox vs. Microsoft Intune

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Automox

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAutomox is an endpoint management solution used to keep desktops, laptops, and servers updated and ready for users anywhere in the world. Using automation, IT can fix critical vulnerabilities and boost user productivity.

    $1

    per month per endpoint

    Microsoft Intune

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Intune (formerly Microsoft Endpoint Manager), combining the capabilities of the former Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager, SCCM or ConfigMgr, is presented as a unified endpoint management option. Microsoft Intune is an endpoint management solution for mobile devices, an MDM solution that allows the user to securely manage iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS devices with a single endpoint management solution. The component Endpoint Configuration Manager (the…

    $5

    per user/per month

    Pricing
    AutomoxMicrosoft Intune
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $5
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 For Individuals
    $6.99
    per month
    Microsoft 365 Apps
    $8.25
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 For Families
    $9.99
    per month
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $12.50
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 Business Premium
    $15
    per user/per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutomoxMicrosoft Intune
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutomoxMicrosoft Intune
    Considered Both Products
    Automox
    Chose Automox
    We chose Automox for it's clean/easy to use UI, remote control capabilities, and automation/patching. The balance of effectiveness and cost made it the best choice for our org
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox has a could based console and platform which can cater the computers outside the network. It's not possible in Lan Guard. Also Automox support cross platform and have a very big 3rd party application support than intune. So better to go with Automox
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Cloud-based solution with no need for on-prem infrastructure. Support Windows, macOS, Linux, and third-party applications. Cost-effective solution compared with other vendors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Compared to these solutions, Automox outranks them as the Automox is highly personalized for different types of device types. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS devices very effectively. Other products are also support other types of devices, but not this much of control can …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    AutoMox is the first product I have tried for app updates, and I don't think I need to try any others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox performs a lot better, with better reliability
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    In my experience, Kaseya really lacked reporting of any kind and seemed clunky. Although we were on the on-prem version, not their cloud version, in my experience, their support was less than helpful and more interested in cold-call selling rather than helping me solve problems …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Not used any other products to compare against!
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I think Automox far exceeds N-able in every category. More intuitive, less expensive, etc. Just a much better platform and more user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox lets us control so much more and makes it incredibly easy to target very specific devices for very specific actions. it is also incredibly reliable and I know it will patch as expected with very minimal monitoring. Automox has been the most stable of all the tools I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox blows Intune out of the water in terms of app patching. I don't know why Microsoft doesn't spend money on making pushing patches easy with Intune, but that creates an opportunity for others I guess? If you've ever worked with Intune you know what I'm talking about. If …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox is much easier to handle and has much better usability then Intune. Intune is difficult to use and did not offer what Automox offers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox is better at patching applications such as browsers or Adobe than Intune. Intune, however, has better reporting and a more robust catalog of device management capabilities. We use both in our environment and utilize each of their strengths, as mentioned above. At the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    From a pricing perspective, Automox is very competitive when compared to others with similar feature sets and capabilities. Other solutions from larger vendors were somewhat limited in their visibility, operating system support, and third-party application integration. Automox …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox has a larger list of 3rd party software that is available. In my experience, Automox does not allow you to browse software looking for updates to apply. In my opinion, the reporting of automox sucks comparatively.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Better 3rd party patching and reporting.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Special thing about Automox is that it has customer deploy packages for many remote end points where as other tools listed does not have that privileges. Other tools are not user interface friendly where as Automox user interface is very easy and customizable as well. Unique …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I've used a number of other patching products at previous employers. Automox, while it does not have all the bells and whistles of SCCM, Tanium, or BigFix such as software self service or automated deployment through network scanning, software catalogs, or warranty check …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Nicer user interface and less convoluted
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    The ability to do 3rd party patching - multiple OS' along with the ability to create an organization platform with managed tiers/silos makes using Automox within a larger org that has specific division heads much easier to use. I can control my division tech while leveraging …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Price and ease of use of the product Automox hands down beat them. But those products also had a monitoring component to consider. But when looking at the monitoring component it wasn't intuitive and hard to implement.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I've used Group Policy, SCCM, Chef, Puppet, psexec, Ivanti, and PDQDeploy. The big lifters like SCCM, Chef, or Puppet enable more complex and refined configuration management. They also require a lot more knowledge to manage let alone at least some understanding of the …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    AutomoxMicrosoft Intune
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (126 ratings)
    9.4
    (50 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (91 ratings)
    7.5
    (9 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.9
    (14 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (14 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)