TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Automox

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAutomox is an endpoint management solution used to keep desktops, laptops, and servers updated and ready for users anywhere in the world. Using automation, IT can fix critical vulnerabilities and boost user productivity.

    $1

    per month per endpoint

    Rapid7 InsightVM

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AInsightVM is presented as the next evolution of Nexpose, by Rapid7. This Insight cloud-based solution features everything included in Nexpose, such as Adaptive Security and the proprietary Real Risk score, and extends visibility into cloud and containerized infrastructure. InsightVM also offers advanced remediation, tracking, and reporting capabilities not included in Nexpose.

    $19

    per GB

    Pricing
    AutomoxRapid7 InsightVM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Log Management
    $19
    per GB
    Vulnerability Management
    $22
    per asset
    insightIDR
    $52
    per asset
    Application Security
    $2,000
    per app
    insignConnect
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutomoxRapid7 InsightVM
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutomoxRapid7 InsightVM
    Considered Both Products
    Automox
    Chose Automox
    We felt that Automox provided us with the functionality our MSP offered, including OS and device patching, as well as remote control capabilities, but in a better and more manageable way. We also felt the usability of the tool gave us the ability to be effective in our way of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox was a much simpler to use and more robust patching solution. It handles both Microsoft and third party patches without issue and allows for simple but powerful scripted deployments and planning.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    To cover our whole network we would have needed two or more products to cover Windows, Linux and Apple OS. And with Automox we get all 3 in one console. The others were fine, at the time we evaluated them they just did not provide us an all in one solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Reasonably priced for what you get. Easy to use. Worklets
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    The Automox interface is way friendlier and easy to use. Time is money and I save both by choosing Automox.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    In my opinion, PDQ Deploy is better than yall and at a much better price point. We selected Automox last year because the network engineer at the time was [...] with powershell and liked what he saw. He promptly left after the contract was signed and before we integrated …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    The ability to do 3rd party patching - multiple OS' along with the ability to create an organization platform with managed tiers/silos makes using Automox within a larger org that has specific division heads much easier to use. I can control my division tech while leveraging …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Our primary goal was to find a solution that does patching and does it well. Compared to the other products we evaluated, Automox was the only one to offer true cross-platform patching support. Likewise, the Automox endpoint agent has a much lighter footprint on devices than …
    Incentivized
    Rapid7
    Chose Rapid7 InsightVM
    Product functionality and performance
    Financial/organizational viability
    Product roadmap and future vision
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AutomoxRapid7 InsightVM
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Automox and Rapid7 InsightVM
    Feature
    Automox
    -
    Ratings
    Rapid7 InsightVM
    7.5
    6 Ratings
    Network Analytics00 Ratings5.36 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.36 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings9.36 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.76 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Automox and Rapid7 InsightVM
    Feature
    Automox
    -
    Ratings
    Rapid7 InsightVM
    8.3
    6 Ratings
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings8.66 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings8.66 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings6.95 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AutomoxRapid7 InsightVM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (126 ratings)
    9.0
    (13 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (91 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    7.2
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)