TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Control-M

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AutoSys Workload Automation

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/ABroadcom offers AutoSys Workload Automation, a solution to enhance visibility and control of complex workloads across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. It helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. It is based on the former CA AutoSys, acquired by Broadcom with CA Technologies.N/A

    Control-M

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AControl-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance.

    $29,000

    per year

    Pricing
    AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    On-Premise
    Contact Sales
    SaaS
    Starting at $29,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
    Considered Both Products
    Broadcom
    No answer on this topic
    BMC Software Inc.
    Chose Control-M
    Stability and Capacity of Control-M is anytime higher than any other batch tool in market.
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    We have been using Control-M for almost 20 years and our teams are already trained to use it. Other tools are not as robust and resilient as Control-M. Control-M's graphical interface is very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Control-M is better then AutoSys in all aspects, from managing the solution to using it to basic and advanced functionality.
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Control-M comes out on top in this comparison.

    It is a very innovative and feature-rich solution and can be used to complete many diverse tasks and solve different issues, resulting in significant time savings and cost-effectiveness.
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Every scheduler is unique in its features . And every tool as its own advantage and disadvantage . And Control-M does too Control-M support is awesome . Never seen any delay . Its very easy to manage and easy to use . Easy integration
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Control-M out ranks them all.
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Pictorial view and Stability are two things that make Control-M great. The configuration manager, which is best used to manage all the system parameters, is better than updating files(in HWA and AUTOSYS, we do). Site standards and WCM are two other revolutionary things BMC …
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Control-M stands out in the workload automation space for its robust orchestration capabilities, especially in complex, hybrid IT environmentsActiveBatch: Known for its rich integrations and intuitive workflow designer,

    ActiveBatch often scores higher in ease of use and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    Control-M: Known for its comprehensive workload automation capabilities, handling complex job scheduling, dependency management, and IT process automation. TWS: Traditionally strong in Batch processing and job scheduling, focusing on high-performance computing environments. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Control-M
    We need end to end automation, so using Control-M we can achieve this but by using Azure Automation it automates data pipelines across the cloud. Compared to Autosys, Control-M has more advanced and modern UI and simple job life cycle management. When compared with Apache …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of AutoSys Workload Automation and Control-M
    Feature
    AutoSys Workload Automation
    -
    Ratings
    Control-M
    8.7
    124 Ratings
    Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings9.4120 Ratings
    Central monitoring00 Ratings9.2114 Ratings
    Logging00 Ratings8.3118 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications00 Ratings8.6119 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization00 Ratings8.4112 Ratings
    Application integration00 Ratings8.4115 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AutoSys Workload AutomationControl-M
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (124 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (20 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (80 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (5 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.3
    (15 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (5 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (5 ratings)