AWS Batch vs. Stonebranch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Batch
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
With AWS Batch, users package the code for batch jobs, specify dependencies, and submit batch jobs using the AWS Management Console, CLIs, or SDKs. AWS Batch allows users to specify execution parameters and job dependencies, and facilitates integration with a broad range of popular batch computing workflow engines and languages (e.g., Pegasus WMS, Luigi, Nextflow, Metaflow, Apache Airflow, and AWS Step Functions).N/A
Stonebranch
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Stonebranch provides enterprise-wide workload automation software solutions that are designed to solve complex IT business processes in a simple way - from Amazon Web Services, Docker, OpenStack, Hadoop, Microsoft Azure to z/OS batch processes on the mainframe. Stonebranch’s Universal Automation Center (UAC) is a system of four enterprise workload automation products: Universal Controller Universal Agent Universal Data Mover Universal Data Mover…N/A
Pricing
AWS BatchStonebranch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS BatchStonebranch
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsCommercial models include Perpetual, Subscription & Usage-based and clients can choose the model that best suits their business. The Stonebranch software license models allow for unlimited concurrent and named users and the Perpetual and Subscription models include unlimited job executions per day – there are no license upgrades due to tasks per day increases. Licenses for a Disaster Recovery site are offered free of charge.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS BatchStonebranch
Considered Both Products
AWS Batch
Chose AWS Batch
Overall AWS Batch, I found easy compare to other softwares which i have tried, It is easy to setup the multiple jobs and on demand we can push our new jobs and same will be monitored by the monitoring dashboards provided by AWS batch, easy to schedule the new job using AWS batch.
Chose AWS Batch
We wanted to start everything on a scale & with fewer resources to manage the underlying infrastructure.
Stonebranch

No answer on this topic

Features
AWS BatchStonebranch
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
AWS Batch
7.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Stonebranch
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS BatchStonebranch
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS BatchStonebranch
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS BatchStonebranch
Likelihood to Recommend
Start with reviewing all your jobs, consolidating the timeline, and making a plan on what all jobs need to be prioritized. These can be optimized based on cost and performance. With a continuously changing workload, AWS Batch helps to build and automate the jobs across various resources. It also helps to manage the performance and workload.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • S3 amount of files
  • Easy to share files to other sites
  • Like that the files and folders can be open and public or completely private
  • I like that you can have double or mirroring in different Data Centers for Data Recovery
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Jobs monitoring dashboards are not matured
  • Documentation and support is something which can be improved
  • Sometime i faced the slow response or slow in performance i would say
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Key advantages include cost-effectiveness through dynamic resource provisioning and the use of spot instances. It auto-scales to meet workload demands, allowing easy job submission via the AWS Management Console or SDKs. It integrates seamlessly with other services like S3 and CloudWatch. It features automatic retries for failed jobs. It allows for a custom computing environment tailored to specific needs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CF did not have a way to store the videos and I did not want to do so in YouTube because of privacy reasons.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Well compared to the cost of having multiple lambda's or some other custom solution working, it has has a postiive impact
  • Helped in orchestrating the jobs, has saved time of developers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Stonebranch Screenshots

Screenshot of Drag & Drop InterfaceScreenshot of Integrated DashboardsScreenshot of User Definition