AWS CloudFormation vs. Upstash
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 AWS CloudFormation | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | AWS CloudFormation gives developers and systems administrators a way to create and manage a collection of related AWS resources, provisioning and updating them in a predictable fashion. Use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run an application. Users don’t need to figure out the order for provisioning AWS services or the subtleties of making those dependencies work.… | $0 |
 Upstash | N/A | N/A | Upstash is presented as Serverless Data for Redis and Kafka, with per-request-pricing users only pay what is used. Built-in REST API allows users to produce and consume Kafka topics from anywhere. And the Upstash REST API enables access from Cloudflare Workers and Fastly Compute@Edge. | $0.20 per 100k commands |
| AWS CloudFormation | Upstash | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no additional charge for using AWS CloudFormation with resource providers in the following namespaces: AWS::*, Alexa::*, and Custom::*. In this case you pay for AWS resources (such as Amazon EC2 instances, Elastic Load Balancing load balancers, etc.) created using AWS CloudFormation as if you created them manually. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no required upfront commitments. When you use resource providers with AWS CloudFormation outside the namespaces mentioned above, you incur charges per handler operation. Handler operations are create, update, delete, read, or list actions on a resource. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS CloudFormation | Upstash | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.6 | - |