AWS CodeBuild vs. CloudBees Codeship

It is really good for building projects in the cloud. If you try to do build the project first locally and then push that stack to the cloud it could take a lot of time. In this way, it also consumes a lot of resources in the computer and in the network.

Incentivized

Codeship is very well suited to teams that have specialized devops members along with other specialized developers. It lets the other developers focus on what they do best, without having to learn another technology stack. This has cut down on a lot of headaches at our company with developers needing to deploy code to various different hosting services across different content management systems. The experience to push code is essentially the same for a developer no matter what the underlying technology is

Incentivized

• Customization
• Do code builds within a schedule or when the source code changes
• Only pay for the build time used

Incentivized

• Easy and fast deployment
• A lot of tool integrations (Slack, GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab)
• Getting tests to run is fast and easy

Incentivized

• It was difficult to create a branching strategy with GitHub. We had everything running from main, but in a true devops environment, we would like to incorporate a true branching strategy.
• I would like to share build projects with each AWS account we utilize versus creating a build project in each account. It will allow us consistent deployments across the board.
• The error logs are natively in AWS, but when developers do not have access, there is no way for them to view error logs for maintenance other than an admin who has access to share the error logs.

Incentivized

• UX: The overall UX is not bad, but it still needs a lot of improvement.
• It took me quite a while to realize that in order to switch projects I needed to press my current project name so a dropdown would appear.
• Integration with bitbucket is somewhat hidden from the users's hands. Got to make some improvements there.

Incentivized

It is a highly usable, well integrated CI/CD service, patricularly for AWS-centric organizations. It is a strong balance between simplicity and flexibility. Security was integrated with AWS Secrets Manager allowing secrets to be retrieved dynamically - a huge usability win for us. I did not enjoy the manual build for each environment

Incentivized

I've used GitHub Actions compared to AWS CodeBuild - I enjoyed the integration with AWS from a codebuild perspective, but GitHub Actions and Workflows allowed us to create a reusable pipeline which is more in line with our devops structure. I enjoy AWS CodeBuild, but from a true continuous deployment, GitHub Actions was more fit.

Incentivized

Codeship is easier to use than Jenkins because it does not require you to set up your own server, and it provides a large amount of out-of-the-box integrations for version control systems and cloud environments. AWS CodePipeline is native to AWS and cannot deploy applications reliably to other cloud environments such as GCP or Azure.

Incentivized

• AWS CodeBuild was introduces as a core enabler for automating database deployments and enforcing a standardization across six environments. The standardization and quality control was well received.
• Security was baked in reducing audit findings.
• Deployments took minutes to update all environments compared to hours. It helped us a lot to reduce drift and deploy consistently.

Incentivized

• We have a few small projects with different developers and Codeship shows everyone clearly, if something work, or if it doesn't.
• In one small project with a team of three developers, we have configured two builds and it takes 2-5 minutes for everyone on the team to push changes to an infrastructure handling a little over 3M users.