AWS CodeCommit vs. GitKraken

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS CodeCommit
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It is designed to make it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem.
$1
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
GitKraken
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$1,250
per installed license
Pricing
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Editions & Modules
Subscription
$1.00
Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
Installed by You
$1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Considered Both Products
AWS CodeCommit
Chose AWS CodeCommit
CodeCommit is a cloud native solution where GitHub is typically run on prem which requires a team to manage the physical servers and the software on top of it. CodeCommit is a better choice when doing Cloud focused workloads. GitHub Copilot offers more features than the leaner …
GitKraken
Chose GitKraken
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Chose GitKraken
I actually like Jira better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Chose GitKraken
We are currently using all three listed above in conjunction with Axosoft. Both Jira and Axosoft are currently being used for the same purpose as we try and identify which product is better suited for us. We use GitHub and Slack in conjunction with Axosoft but not in the same …
Features
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
AWS CodeCommit
-
Ratings
GitKraken
9.9
Ratings
19% above category average
Branching and Merging00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Version History00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Pull Requests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Code Review Tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Access Control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Branch Protection00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.7 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS CodeCommitGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
Non-cloud users often complain about CodeCommit because it is so barebones, which it is. However, I believe that is by design. It is not supposed to be a full-fledged AI integrated GitLab alternative. Once users or developers get over the learning curve and required Cloud dependency, CodeCommit is a great service that offers a perfect complement / augmentation to on prem options. It is ideal for Cloud-native deployments where the code and production service are close together.
Read full review
Axosoft is well suited as a project management tool for software teams looking to track workloads. Great tool for categorizing features, tasks, bugs, or a customized category into sprints. Companies can take advantage of the tracking aspects to create burndown charts or just to track employee time. I would say it is less appropriate for small task management like a to-do list type application because it has so many features that would go to waste. Furthermore, Axosoft is more geared towards development teams, but you could use it across departments if needed.
Read full review
Pros
  • Lightweight
  • Native IAM integration
  • Collaboration
  • High Availability
Read full review
  • Creating pull request
  • Connection to various services
  • Git flow
Read full review
Cons
  • Integration with non-Cloud services
  • Learning curve for devs
  • Barebones
Read full review
  • A bit hard to use, or a steep learning curve. The UI isn't super intuitive at first, it took me awhile to pick it up and I had to get someone to basically show me what they recommend I set my filters and UI to.
  • This might be a case of improper setup but when making tickets, there isn't an auto response, so we get a lot of duplicate tickets if a conversation happens on the emails before someone takes the case and replies through OnTime.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Once you get the hang of Axosoft, I think it's easy to use however... getting the hang of it takes quite a bit of time. Additionally, once Axosoft makes an update, it can be difficult to find your bearings again. Like I said, once you know how to use the product, I think it's easy but it takes a bit to become comfortable and confident with Axosoft
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CodeCommit is a cloud native solution where GitHub is typically run on prem which requires a team to manage the physical servers and the software on top of it. CodeCommit is a better choice when doing Cloud focused workloads. GitHub Copilot offers more features than the leaner CodeCommit, however does not have the same integration options
Read full review
Updated technology and ease of use make GitKraken stand out against other products we've used in the past.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 20% reduction in traffic to on-prem GitHub
  • No additional server capacity required
  • No overhead or maintainance
Read full review
  • Axosoft has positively affected the time management of our employee resources
  • Axosoft has shown us where we have inefficiencies in the organization
  • Axosoft has allowed us to track projects better, get them out on time allowing for more projects to be scheduled and, in turn, increased our subscriber count.
Read full review
ScreenShots