AWS CodeDeploy is a fully managed deployment service that automates software deployments to a variety of compute services such as Amazon EC2, AWS Fargate, AWS Lambda, and on-premises servers. AWS CodeDeploy aims to make it easier for users to rapidly release new features, avoid downtime during application deployment, and handle the complexity of updating applications.
$0.02
per on-premises instance
EMCO MSI Package Builder
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Icelandic company EMCO Software offers MSI Package Builder, a software distribution solution.
N/A
Pricing
AWS CodeDeploy
EMCO MSI Package Builder
Editions & Modules
AWS CodeDeploy
$0.02
per on-premises instance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS CodeDeploy
EMCO MSI Package Builder
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS CodeDeploy
EMCO MSI Package Builder
Considered Both Products
AWS CodeDeploy
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose AWS CodeDeploy
Both have the same concept, but AWS has gained some ground over Google by creating cheaper services, and the fact they have servers wherever there is an Amazon makes the speed to access the platform faster and the jumps in the network also quicker. GCP has its global advantage …
Jenkins has been the reliable workhorse but it has aged quite a bit. The biggest issue with open source Jenkins is the requirement of hosting it by yourself, as it is not available inside AWS context as a service. That does fit into cloud-native thinking where you want to focus …
Jenkins supports a lot of plugings. Also with Jenkins, it is possible to manage everything through our own server. Those are 2 points where I rate Jenkins as one of the best DevOps Tool.
The most important reason we use AWS CodeDeploy was we use Amazon Web Services and our ecosystem platform. We want all the software components seamlessly integrated together. The CI/CD is always an issue to our software process, and also, we don't want to have any downtime when …
Provides advanced functionality for the enterprise level software deployment analyst over and above the basic tools that Microsoft included with the original APP-v sequencing tool, allowing the analyst greater control over what is captured and how it is captured. This makes the …
For greenfield projects built on AWS there are very few reasons why not to choose AWS CodeDeploy. It works out of the box and integrates seamlessly into your cloud environment. If you plan to migrate your existing legacy builds away e.g. from Jenkins, you may need to reserve a substantial amount of time for that and the benefits gained may not be worth the effort.
For large, complex software deployments that have a number of install scenarios and executables that interact with one another, EMCO MSI Builder is well-suited. It is able to track software installs, registry changes, file additions, and deletions, modifying shortcuts and anything else that would be needed to prepare big deployment projects for large organizations.
Here is where AWS as a whole stepped up big. The UI is more intuitive and easy to use. The separation is clear, and the guides are abundant. They still need to create starter tutorials for newcomers so we don't lose much time learning/teaching others. Having someone with basic knowledge and examples where they can gain experience will make it better.
Both have the same concept, but AWS has gained some ground over Google by creating cheaper services, and the fact they have servers wherever there is an Amazon makes the speed to access the platform faster and the jumps in the network also quicker. GCP has its global advantage because it is extremely easy to use, but overall, AWS has more to offer as long as you know it.
Provides advanced functionality for the enterprise level software deployment analyst over and above the basic tools that Microsoft included with the original APP-v sequencing tool, allowing the analyst greater control over what is captured and how it is captured. This makes the impact of needing to change the deployment package easier to maintain and update