TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).

    $35

    per month

    Pricing
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Editions & Modules
    No Charge
    $0
    Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    There are many services like AWS Elastic beanstalk, but there are none with the maturity in the platform or the cost-effectiveness of AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Also, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the oldest among them, so there are more people with AWS experience than the other …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I have used App Engine on Google Cloud Platform and App Service on Microsoft Azure. Both offer similar capabilities to AWS Elastic Beanstalk. App Engine has the nice ability to scale to 0 instances when the application has not been in use for some time. This allows for …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    As it supports end to end flow of application deployment and not a part of any individual process like other AWS products, AWS Elastic Beanstalk can be a game changer in cloud industry.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    The AWS platform provides a great deal of configurability that is abstracted and provided very well through AWS Elastic Beanstalk. This is the main reason for choosing Elastic Beanstalk over competing services. Another reason for selecting AWS Beanstalk was vendor …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I selected AWS Elastic Beanstalk mainly because we have been using AWS services for our company. Using AWS Elastic Beanstalk is relatively easier than starting to use a completely new cloud platform. But we are also reviewing Google App Engine, and found out Elastic Beanstalk …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk is equivalent to Google App Engine in terms of product. I selected AWS Elastic Beanstalk because it was within the stack we were using, and it made sense for us given the other architecture.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I use both EB and Lambda for different use cases. I normally use AWS Lambda for my smaller software needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We now default to Amazon ECS, due to flexibility this gives us with how workloads scale, and more network flexibility as many of our workloads are internal / external facing. We selected Elastic Beanstalk at beginning of our containerization phase, which suited our needs …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Azure currently doesn't have a solution that's similar to this but you can do a lot of the features with several of the components that Microsoft Azure offers. AWS Elastic Beanstalk exists in that niche market where if you have an existing solution, this is a great way to move &…
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We were already hosting on AWS so it just made sense to keep our infrastructure where we have it. And it all works pretty nicely.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    AWS is much more focused on scalability, but Heroku was much easier to get things up and running as a beginner. For simple hosting, I would stick to something like Heroku or Netlify. That said, Elastic Beanstalk is meant for more performant functions requiring large scaling and …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a great option for an organization that's already invested in the AWS ecosystem. The greater the number of complementary features needed by the application (e.g. integrating with Amazon's Elastic Load Balancer, databases, etc), the greater the reward …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We also use Heroku and it is a great platform for smaller projects and light Node.js services, but we have found that in terms of cost, the Elastic Beanstalk option is more affordable for the projects that we undertake. The fact that it sits inside of the greater AWS Cloud …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We ended up with AWS Lambda to take workload off the developers and develop in tandem, then later integrate. We use both though.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I enjoyed that Lightsail was so simple to provision and access via the in-browser SSH terminal, but ultimately Elastic Beanstalk is a more robust offering that interfaces seamlessly with more of AWS's other services. Elastic Beanstalk is also better equipped to automate …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I selected these solutions because they are the closest to being able to set up separate server or VM instances. As far as performance and scalability, Heroku does offer an autoscale option, but the base cost to have the autoscale in place, sets Heroku behind EBS. Digital …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We didn't use Lambda much till now. We, however, found better control of resources in EBS.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Honestly, I haven't tried any other alternative products. As already mentioned, I am already heavily invested in AWS, so EBS was a natural choice for me. In other reviews, I have found, AWS is better than its competitors. There are more flavors, and options in AWS, better …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Heroku is another similar product which we had tried out to deploy one of the NodeJs project and it has lot of developer friendly features as well. Though Heroku is more expensive than Beanstalk is what I found. Heroku also has some restrictions which can affect the …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    The other main competitor that I have used would probably be Heroku. While Heroku is incredibly simple and easy to get a sample web app online, its dashboard and product connectivity didn't feel quite as seamless as AWS Elastic Beanstalk. AWS Elastic Beanstalk has a higher up …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    In some of the other companies that I've worked in, I've had the opportunity to work with the above softwares where the structure and architecture of the services was much complicated but the above softwares were able to handle it with more ease and efficiency. The complex …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Feature
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    7.9
    29 Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces8.119 Ratings
    Scalability7.229 Ratings
    Platform management overhead8.128 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability7.223 Ratings
    Platform access control8.128 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration8.128 Ratings
    Development environment creation7.228 Ratings
    Development environment replication8.129 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification8.128 Ratings
    Issue recovery9.126 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes8.127 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.2
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (2 ratings)