Axcient x360Recover (formerly BRC) can not only recover a single server or desktop, but can automate the recovery of an entire customer site through its Virtual Office and automated Runbook features. In a disaster event, authorized users can log into the web application or Remote Management Console and create a virtual private cloud called a Virtual Office. The Virtual Office ensures security, privacy and reliability for every organization needing to run one or more failover virtual machines in…
N/A
Cisco CloudLock
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
CloudLock is a cloud security option acquired by Cisco in August 2016.
Axcient x360Recover's fixed low-cost all-inclusive model to backup across servers, workstations, Azure VM's, and Microsoft 365 is far lower cost with just as good capabilities (except retention windows) to all others we've evaluated.
Axcient's x360Recover appliance is functionally similar to Datto's Siris line. Axcient x360Recover devices offer significant cost savings over Siris without losing features or performance. Axcient x360Recover support is also much nicer to interact with over Datto. Monthly …
Axcient is more partner friendly than Datto. They listen to our concerns and implement them. They are always trying to make things better. Datto seemed to only want money and only cared about that. They didn't care about the partners at all.
Axcient x360 is cheaper and as reliable as Datto. You can also build your own appliance with Axcient x360 and we have had a lot of success with recycling old client's servers to use as BDR appliance. Axcient support is way better than any backup companies I have ever dealt with …
Reliable, Faster and Cheaper then the competition. Datto gave us a bad taste in our mouth on our very first client. We purchased their recommended hardware, setup and our initial install at a trial clients office with the engineer and one of our techs and when the time came, …
Security and encryption of Axcient is a top priority . Axcient have all the tools to provide solutions to different kind of businesses Best part is it has an MSP friendly console to manage multiples devices and clients at the same Dashboard.
We've been a Datto partner for many years. For the longest time, Datto was the "Gold Standard" for this type of Business Continuity and Data Recovery (BCDR) solutions. Since our partnership with Axcient, we have completely moved away from Datto... especially now that Datto is a …
It's another service offered by axcient for different purposes and works well, when it works. The file sync has offered easy file accessibility anywhere for clients that use it.
We have used N-able's offering in the past, and switched to Axcient mainly because of the pricing. We have stayed because Axcient continues to improve on its portal and has never given us a reason to look elsewhere.
I like Axcient x360Recover way better than Datto. I used a few Datto appliances for a couple years and as soon as contracts are up on them, I will be repurposing them to x360Recover. Unitrends MSP is a pretty good product that has a different use case. I use it for hyper visor …
Amazon Macie is limited to an AWS environment and fulfills some of the same functions that CloudLock does in SaaS products. Both are very valuable tools, so the decision is not really which to use, but whether to use both for their respective environments. In general I feel …
We have not used other cloud security products. While choosing a product a large factor was the current and future integrations with other Cisco security stack products. While this product is not the most affordable, the security provided to the organization and client data is …
Cisco CloudLock has an automatic approach to matters safety, analysis, and monitoring. Further, Cisco CloudLock has supported encryption, making it standard and simpler. Again, Cisco CloudLock [ensures] that credible details and documents such as credit card numbers are fully …
It has a better alert mechanism and provides the facility to take action within the G Suite. With McAfee, we did not have these features and it is more cost-effective than McAfee. Although they are similar, now that we have used Cisco CloudLock, I would recommend using Cisco …
This is well suited for the backup of different appliances, i.e., Windows, VMware, and other SAAS and IAAS products. We use Axcient x360Cloud to backup the server and workstations, and it makes it very easy to find and recover deleted data in case it is needed. It is less appropriate when we are trying to open the virtual machines of the backup storepoints and the speed is very slow.
Cisco CloudLock is there to shield the most sensitive business database and activities, for instance, the [customer's] credit cards, the code keys, the login details, among others. More so, Cisco CloudLock protects and monitors some information in various software or systems, like that of G-suit, making the entire system reliable and convenient. Finally, Cisco CloudLock determines the response of the activity be conducted to control some of the activities that [put] a company in threat.
Data Loss Prevention - files accessed from outside of the organization can be audited or blocked based on content, file type, and regex
Policy Management - policy options are sophisticated and give great control over the actions to be taken and when the policy should be triggered
Behavioral Analysis - cloudlock is usually the first place we learn about suspicious activity in our SaaS applications, such as login attempts from outside the country
The only thing missing is the ability to cancel a backup as they appear to just continue to try to run even after rebooting the BDR and endpoint until a failure finally occurs.
The only other ask would be to expand support to Linux operating systems.
We've been using Axcient over the years and have worked with their development team to suggest new features, something that you would not normally be able to do with other companies. They listen to what we have to say and understand that we are a business, just like them. It's great to know that someone will always be there for you when you need them.
It is overall very easy to install and get working. Install the application, select the drives you want to backup or leave blank and backup all drives. It starts to run immediately. You configure all the backup retention and how often to run in the portal so once you deploy the agent it is very easy to get started. After the backup completes. The portal will perform a test boot and auto verification of the image.
Issues with failing backups drag out for months at a time. Axcient hardware replacements are quick to be suggested by support but as the issues are most often with the software architecture this almost never helps. Support often uses their access to the appliance as a back door into customer environments without our consent and despite our repeated complaints, accessing our customers servers and executing disruptive diagnostics like chkdsk in the middle of production hours for that customer environment. More recently they've been blaming their frequent off-site transfer failures on our customer's firewalls (of all makes and models) and insisting that the only possible resolution is to increase the TCP session timeout dangerously high (multiple hours), putting every client environment at substantial disk of even accidental Denial of Service attacks. Talking to any two support individuals, even when escalated all the way to their development team, often yields entirely different and contradictory answers regardless of the problem.
They are very quick to respond and go the extra mile to help address our issues. That said, we've only needed them at the early stages of implementation for support help and occasionally when we want to do a full re-scan of our site. They are very flexible in working with us on the timing of such scans.
I had the miss fortune to go back to this device. Alot has changed since the first time I had used it. Now instead a full deployable network appliance, you have to download a preconfigured virtual machine that will only run on an ESXi server. What about Hyper-V? I have many clients that are Hyper-V only. I setup a test lab to get this thing up and running and it has been a nightmare to say the least. Will be looking at other options.
Reliable, Faster and Cheaper then the competition. Datto gave us a bad taste in our mouth on our very first client. We purchased their recommended hardware, setup and our initial install at a trial clients office with the engineer and one of our techs and when the time came, the engineer was unable to get their own product to work as expected. Luckily for us, we already explained to the client that this was a trial so we were not held accountable but if this was a live instance, it would of been embarrassing
We have not used other cloud security products. While choosing a product a large factor was the current and future integrations with other Cisco security stack products. While this product is not the most affordable, the security provided to the organization and client data is well worth the investment. We use SecureX to integrate and perform automated responses.