Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions vs. Cube

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Syntellis Performance Solutions provides enterprise performance management software, data and analytics solution for healthcare organizations, financial institutions, and higher education institutions. Axiom arms finance teams and executives with tools for budgeting, forecasting, planning, and reporting, so they can analyze results, model the future, and make more strategic decisions. Their solutions include enterprise planning, cost and decision support, and financial and clinical…N/A
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.N/A
Pricing
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Considered Both Products
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
Chose Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
When we shopped for Axiom, there really wasn't any comparable product on the marketplace that we could find. It has a full suite of products (including some we don't use like capital management, profitability, productivity, and benchmarking), and everything was in "one place." …
Chose Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
Axiom was selected based on the impression of ease of use and integration. It is capable of holding all of our entities data while giving us an easier more accessible way to deliver monthly Financials and reports to managers. Then in costing we signed up because the impression …
Chose Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
The only other system I have worked with was the Fiserv MPC product, which is what we had Axiom replace. The Fiserv MPC product does not even come close to the functionality of Axiom. For our Budget, we would have to run an Excel Macro in Fiserv MPC overnight which took about …
Chose Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
wasn't on the evaluation team
Chose Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
Vena was a strong product, but only our department within the University used it for budgeting. The entire university chose Axiom for the increased scale and capacity. The loading and saving performance of Axiom is slightly better than Vena. Also, Axiom provides more …
Cube
Chose Cube
Cube lacks a lot of the forecasting and planning capabilities of other FP&A tools in the market, but it excels at providing flexibility in aggregating data from multiple places into a single source of truth and then building reports driven off of that data. Cube is very …
Chose Cube
Prefer Cube but mainly due to my new company being early stage start up and moving away from excel was not the answer
Chose Cube
Cube has an easier implementation and functionality is appropriate, quick-to-learn and a perfect match for an organisation of our scale and growth. There is less flexibility in the reporting & formatting in-built in Cube, and it's a far way off the in-built modelling …
Chose Cube
We needed something that was quick to implement, easy to use, and had a small learning curve. Cube has delivered.
Chose Cube
Cube's ability to create custom reports easily on the fly, fully excel based, and simple to use
Chose Cube
Cube was the most flexible while still doing everything we need it to do. Because it is a spreadsheet native platform we could quickly and easily integrate it into the processes we already had. While at the same time learning how Cube worked so that we could fully leverage its …
Chose Cube
Cube support team is much more willing to help. Cube product team is adding new features at a faster pace. Cube is more functional within excel. Cube has better version control and general ledger organization. Cube customer service is incredibly helpful and their team is full …
Chose Cube
Cube was chosen because of its price, customer support and ease to integrate and learn. my team learned it pretty fast and their customer support team consists of ex-fpa folks so they know the problems that the users deal with on a day to day. they gave us a good plan to …
Chose Cube
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality …
Chose Cube
Cube is a much simpler and easier to use platform compared to its competitors. The setup was extremely easy, and required almost no help from IT. The big standout difference was the cube support team though. They were available from start to finish when implementing the …
Chose Cube
Causal is a much more sophisticated product, but would require that we completely switch away from all of our current models and using google sheets. Cube allowed us to continue operating as is, but with a quicker data connection.
Chose Cube
Workday Adaptive Planning was too cumbersome to implement. It was expected to take 6 months to implement it + teething issues. This would be after you know exactly what you want.
With our business that is going through significant growth year on year and things rapidly changing, …
Chose Cube
90% of what Hyperion offered Cube offers. Cube is missing the drill down feature which I believe is its biggest flaw. If you have revenue you cant double click on revenue and have it blow out all the revenue accounts at the lowest level. For companies that have hundreds …
Chose Cube
Cube Planning's ability to integrate with multiple softwares as well as excel and sheets really set it apart from the competition.
Chose Cube
I guess Oracle PBCS is more suitable for a larger organization. Thus with a small company lie us that require agile planning and reporting, it's not as good of a fit.
Chose Cube
Cube is a much more cost-effective tool that is also much simpler for the business to manage. It does not require an in-house IT team and the admin functionalities are very straightforward.
Chose Cube
We switched to Cube because of its ease of use. Adaptive had way too many moving parts and was too restrictive for what we were trying to achieve. With a small Finance team, it was hard to have multiple people be power users of Adaptive vs Cube which was extremely intuitive for …
Chose Cube
Other products are more robust than Cube Planning (Anaplan, Vena) but the price tag is also way higher. Cube Planning provides us with flexibility, customer support, and overall great value for money
Chose Cube
I was not a part of the search process but I really like using Cube.
Chose Cube
Planful was just a bit too advanced (and costly) for what we needed at this point of our company (much like Adaptive). With those types of platforms, you really do need a consultant to help create the needs specific to your personal business, which ends up adding costs. Causal …
Chose Cube
Cube Planning is more flexible and integrates more easily with Google Sheets and Excel.
Chose Cube
Cube is more affordable than other finance products that are out there. I have also tried Plan Guru, but ran into issues as Plan Guru desktop version was only for PC's and cloud version did not have the same capabilities as the desktop version, so it was a catch-22.
Chose Cube
It was the ease of implementation, the speed to be up and running, the competitive price, and the continued support that sold us on Cube compared to other software.
Features
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
5.9
Ratings
33% below category average
Cube
7.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Long-term financial planning5.70 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.70 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Forecasting5.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling3.80 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Management reporting6.40 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
4.4
Ratings
58% below category average
Cube
8.5
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial data consolidation2.90 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting5.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails4.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
5.1
Ratings
45% below category average
Cube
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting6.80 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Management Reporting5.60 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting5.10 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting3.90 Ratings6.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing4.20 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
3.8
Ratings
72% below category average
Cube
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Personalized dashboards3.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards4.80 Ratings7.50 Ratings
KPIs5.10 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis1.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting4.60 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data3.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
6.0
Ratings
33% below category average
Cube
8.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Flat file integration5.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel data integration8.40 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources4.50 Ratings8.30 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
7.5
Ratings
2% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
9.3
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance Solutions
-
Ratings
Cube
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Likelihood to Recommend
5.6
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Axiom Software by Syntellis Performance SolutionsCube
Likelihood to Recommend
Axiom is ideal for organizations with multiple departments that need to collect, share, and integrate data from common internal data sources. The product is best for very large organizations with a lot of financial backing. I wouldn't suggest using Axiom if you're a small organization or only one department, for example.
Read full review
1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
Read full review
Pros
  • Extremely flexible and dynamic allowing for customizations that align with our business needs
  • The database structure within Axiom allows us to create custom tables for adhoc data analysis
  • The processing time of Axiom (daily imports, monthly imports, Budgeting processes) are extremely favorable allowing us to cut our budget cycle time in half compared to our previous system.
Read full review
  • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
  • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
  • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
  • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
Read full review
Cons
  • Implementation is quite Complex and requires both IT and Financial buy-in
  • Reporting solution has some learning curve for end users
  • Calculation methods within reporting can be opaque and hard to trace
Read full review
  • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
  • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
Read full review
Support Rating
For the scale of our implementation, Axiom only assigned two consultants who were both completely new to the company. It felt like we were all learning about the product together, when you would expect them to already be experts at their own product. The team also made a good bit of mistakes throughout production and go-live, which then caused more work internally for us. The team lead for our project also just left the company, so we'll see how next year's planning goes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The only other system I have worked with was the Fiserv MPC product, which is what we had Axiom replace. The Fiserv MPC product does not even come close to the functionality of Axiom. For our Budget, we would have to run an Excel Macro in Fiserv MPC overnight which took about 8 hours to process in order for us to to see the results of the inputs we did the previous day. With Axiom, the non-margin items (Non-Interest Expense, Non-Interest Income) are real time - as soon as you click Save, the data is available. On the Cash Flow Margin side (Loans & Deposits), it takes about 5 minutes to fully process in Axiom approx. 30,000 records, which is extremely favorable.
Read full review
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Forecasting has improved
  • Complexity of analysis has improved as well
  • Our main data has been confused as we started using Axiom
Read full review
  • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
  • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
  • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
Read full review
ScreenShots