Axonius vs. BMC Track-It!

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Axonius
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Axonius, in New York, aims to provide credible asset inventory and enable users to discover coverage gaps and enforce security policies with the Axonius Cybersecurity Asset Management Platform.N/A
BMC Track-It!
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
BMC's Track-It! (formerly Numara Track-It!) is an IT asset management, IT help desk, and license management solution.N/A
Pricing
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Considered Both Products
Axonius

No answer on this topic

BMC Track-It!
Chose BMC Track-It!
This was already in production when I stepped Into a leadership role. There was no urgency to change this. In a perfect world, we would have had more resources to help get the most out of the software.
Chose BMC Track-It!
Like the interface better than a few of the others but it could be time to re-evaluate them again to see what options are out there.
Chose BMC Track-It!
BMC Track-It! is much more bare bones compared to ServiceNow products, and if your department has the money, ServiceNow is a much better option. Not only is the Knowledge Base much easier to create and publish articles, but the asset management in BMC Track-It! is practically …
Chose BMC Track-It!
We just started playing with Mojo. It integrates with Google Enterprise so that's a plus. We're looking forward to giving this one a try as we've played with multiple Help Desk packages and I feel like Mojo might be the one. BMC Track-it! has a far better interface, in my …
Chose BMC Track-It!
Depending on your organization size, you have to be very particular with the ITSM that you choose. Track-It! does the work we need it to right now. However, we will soon need to use something like Jira in order to become a next-generation service desk.
Chose BMC Track-It!
Wrike is a recent addition to our software inventory, which we are primarily using for Change Management and Project Management. Wrike does have a Service Desk (ticketing) functionality, but currently, it cannot do everything that BMC Track-It! can do in relation to ticketing. …
Chose BMC Track-It!
The only other ticket management system that I have used was internally created and while it was much better than BMC in regards to the interface and ease of use they pretty much have the same functionality. I was not part of the decision-making process to select Track–It, so I …
Chose BMC Track-It!
BMC Track-It! has most of the functionality of most other helpdesk tracking systems, meaning it will not only track helpdesk requests but it will also do inventory, asset management, knowledgebase management, and reporting. Where it differs, at least with the older versions, …
Chose BMC Track-It!
ConnectWise was far more robust with a lot more customization, project management features, templates, and documentation. It tied into other software that we needed to do our jobs. The interface was cleaner, the software was faster, and users had an easier time. Oversight was …
Chose BMC Track-It!
BMC Track-IT has great flexibility that ManageEngine and SpiceWorks don't have, however, SpiceWorks is absolutely free and for just a help desk ticketing system is a very solid solution. ManageEngine and ServiceDesk Plus have different modules that could help in different IT …
Chose BMC Track-It!
Spiceworks and BMC FootPrints Service Core
Chose BMC Track-It!
Track-It! has flexibility that ServiceNow couldn't offer us. We also didn't want a separate web portal. Track-It allows for more on premise links and integrations that we just couldn't do with ServiceNow.
Track-It! was more of a blank slate than the alternatives. It allows …
Chose BMC Track-It!
Track-It! was less expensive and had similar features to the competition.
Features
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
IT Asset Management
Comparison of IT Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Axonius
-
Ratings
BMC Track-It!
5.8
Ratings
30% below category average
Software and hardware inventory tracking00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
License management00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Asset lifecycle monitoring00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Contract management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Asset relationship management00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.7 out of 10
Atera
Atera
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AxoniusBMC Track-It!
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
From a technician's point of view, it is extremely easy to create new work orders or tickets. It's also very simple to enter in data and keep track of the state of the ticket without taking too much time to keep it updated. I would love to see a cloud instance available to be able to make it a global installation as our company grows.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The software is simple to use. There doesn't seem to be a lot of bells and whistles which could be attractive to some users.
  • It includes email notifications where users are able to respond to an email and it updates the ticket.
  • The system gives you the ability to customize your view so that you only need to see that tickets that are relevant to you or your group.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Care must be taken when configuring automatic replies otherwise you can end up in an endless loop of emails if response goes to another auto-responder. This will cause tickets to automatically be generated with every reply and then it takes a while to clean up the unwanted tickets.
  • The support model is prohibitively expensive if you let support lapse and then need support once again. This is because they expect you to pay for all of the previous versions/years between when you last paid for support and their current version. This means that if there have been 3 versions of the software since you last had support, they expect you to pay for the 3 versions even if you did not use them. This is a primary reason why we are looking at alternative ticketing systems currently.
  • It would be nice to have the ability to selectively kick a user our of a ticket without having to kick them entirely out of the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I only gave it this rating for the fact that we did not really use their support for much of the time we used the product. The support documentation in the actual program seemed to be lacking, so finding the information via the web or the vendor's site provided more helpful, from a support standpoint. I did notice that the vendor does have a portal where you can manage support cases and also has live phone support and an email option. All of these options are good for any customer that needs good support while using the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
ConnectWise was far more robust with a lot more customization, project management features, templates, and documentation. It tied into other software that we needed to do our jobs. The interface was cleaner, the software was faster, and users had an easier time. Oversight was also much better. That said, it was also far more expensive, and it was developed more for managed service providers and large companies than smaller enterprises like ours.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • The configuration is a bit daunting. We had the software for two years and never got it configured quite right.
  • Spent a lot of wasted time trying to get the software to do what we wanted.
  • We paid for licensing for two years and spent quite a few hours mailing back and forth with support. Overall, a loss.
Read full review
ScreenShots