Azul Platform Prime vs. Oracle Java Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azul Platform Prime
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azul Systems headquartered in Sunnyvale is exclusively focused on Java and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). They build fully supported, standards-compliant runtimes that help enable Java-based businesses. Their services include Azul Platform Prime (formerly Zing), a JVM with "better behavior" enabling sustained performance, fast warmup and predictable latency without GC pauses, jitter or application timeouts. Zing can be deployed in an on-prem data center or on the Cloud.N/A
Java Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Java Cloud Service, a PaaS supporting the fast and easy development of Java applications.
$0.15
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Pricing
Azul Platform PrimeOracle Java Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Enterprise Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
High Performance Edition
$0.3871
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azul Platform PrimeJava Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azul Platform PrimeOracle Java Cloud
Considered Both Products
Azul Platform Prime
Chose Azul Platform Prime
Oracle was costlier whereas Openjdk had less frequent updates. Azul was average of both of them, so it was choosen.
Java Cloud
Chose Java Cloud
We selected Oracle Java Cloud for its native integration with other Oracle solutions and its focus on Java applications. Overall, our experience with Oracle Java Cloud has been positive, as it has improved our efficiency, security, and scalability in developing cloud …
Chose Java Cloud
Google App Engine is great for Java applications where you are using other Google components already, for example Google GCP, Google BigQuery, etc. Redhat, OpenShift, and Pivotal CloudFounder are great when the application is very complex and includes components that are Java …
Best Alternatives
Azul Platform PrimeOracle Java Cloud
Small Businesses
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azul Platform PrimeOracle Java Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azul Platform PrimeOracle Java Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Azul helped use reduce and more efficiently use our AWS EC2 resources. We approached them in Q3 of 2021 with the goal of reducing our overall latency on the JVM 8 platform. They managed to do that for us in such a way that we could expand our options within EC2 for machine architectures and take advantage of additional resources on existing infrastructure that OpenJDK could not at that time.

I'd recommend the platform for teams that are looking to focus on their business problems and not wanting to allocate engineering staff to be full time JVM engineers. I'd also recommend them for companies that have a large extant JVM systems that want a fairly easy way to optimize their current systems without entire rewrites.
Read full review
In specific scenarios, we find that Oracle Java Cloud is suitable for agile development projects, high-concurrency applications, and deployments in multi-cloud environments. However, it may not be the best option for very specialized applications that require specific technologies not supported by the platform
Read full review
Pros
  • Improved real-time JVM
  • Cost effective
  • product support
Read full review
  • Integration with development tools
  • Auto scale
  • Enhanced security
Read full review
Cons
  • Support
  • GC logging
Read full review
  • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
  • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
Read full review
Performance
Good features, Higher throughput, improved security
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Prime support has been responsive in helping us tune our JVM parameters and diagnose any lingering Java resource issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle was costlier whereas OpenJDK had less frequent updates. Azul was average of both of them, so it was choosen.
Read full review
Google App Engine is great for Java applications where you are using other Google components already, for example Google GCP, Google BigQuery, etc. Redhat, OpenShift, and Pivotal CloudFounder are great when the application is very complex and includes components that are Java and non-Java based (Python, etc). Amazon AWS is more difficult to configure than Oracle Java Cloud - Oracle Java Cloud has simpler UI.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • A lot of OPEX savings
  • Easy annual license renewal subscription
  • Standard product usage since it is compatible across different Operating Systems.
Read full review
  • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
  • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
Read full review
ScreenShots