Azure Analysis Services vs. Longview Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Analysis Services
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Azure Analysis Services delivers enterprise-grade BI semantic modeling capabilities with the scale, flexibility, and management benefits of the cloud. Azure Analysis Services helps transform complex data into actionable insights. Azure Analysis Services is built on the analytics engine in Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services.N/A
Longview Analytics
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Longview Analytics is a reporting tool used to create custom dashboards to enable teams to monitor company-wide activities and implement performance-enhancing changes. It is used to improve resource management and strategic impact.N/A
Pricing
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Considered Both Products
Azure Analysis Services
Chose Azure Analysis Services
Microsoft Azure Analysis Services is the best tool available in market in present scenario and it justifies it's role. The solution is packed with lot of functionalities which helps in taking useful decision. The integration and deployment part is easy and need less time and …
Chose Azure Analysis Services
Azure Data Factory
Chose Azure Analysis Services
The best thing about it is the ability to create a query and drill down the data to a more granular level when needed. The best thing about Azure Analysis Services is. It provides secured access anytime from anywhere, it also provides REST API for this, which is very easy to …
Chose Azure Analysis Services
The platform has vast number of features and modules. The UI is sleek and once you get to use to it, you will be able to do a lot of stuff. Also support for data sources is more in Azure Analysis Services.
Chose Azure Analysis Services
We have used the IBM cloud which was truly a specific nightmare for our team. User experience, layout, and design is big for us as it understandably is with many people. Even if any type of program can technically do all that we need it to, we still found our team will not be …
Chose Azure Analysis Services
I had used SAP at a different Organization and the organization where I used Azure Analysis Services was already having it and hence I had to use it. Both have their own sets of pros and cons to look into. To be honest I liked SAP more than Azure Analysis Services
Chose Azure Analysis Services
A different UIUX between both products, but some would say Cloud Platform is easier to be used. Performance-wise both functions to their fullest ability so it boils down to the company's decision to select which products to be implemented. Would definitely not go wrong choosing …
Longview Analytics
Chose Longview Analytics
Personally, I prefer QlikView not because it's more stable but simply just for the looks of the dashboard. One of my clients in Sydney recently moved from arcplan to QlikView. The reason was mainly looks and that QlikView has more training materials for the support users to …
Chose Longview Analytics
acplan beats Qlik on basically everything, including price. It's technically far superior, provides far better security and unlike Qlik does not require coding when things get complex.

arcplan beats Tableau and Yellowfin on capabilities. Tableau and Yellowfin are very good at …
Features
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
8.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Longview Analytics
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.90 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Longview Analytics
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Drill-down analysis9.00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.90 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
9.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Longview Analytics
8.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Publish to Web9.10 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Versioning9.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Longview Analytics
7.1
Ratings
12% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.30 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.20 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.80 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
9.3
Ratings
9% above category average
Longview Analytics
8.2
Ratings
3% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.20 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
8.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Longview Analytics
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access8.50 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mobile Application9.50 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.50 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Azure Analysis Services
8.9
Ratings
13% above category average
Longview Analytics
-
Ratings
REST API8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Analysis ServicesLongview Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Azure Analysis Services is best tool which is well suited for many type of scenarios. Like if the organization is dealing with a lot of critical data and need some better analysis and insights for that data then tool serves the best. It helps in depth analysis and getting the desired result which helps in making big decision for any organization. We can create role based access for sensitive data hence it is very helpful for security point of view. Helps in making the business more productive and taking decision based on facts. It is less appropriate for scenarios like where data amount is less and the solution is very costly and someone can get a cheaper solution. Also not suited for environment where user directory do not exist because without the help of user directory role could not be created hence proper utilization of this tool will not be possible.
Read full review
arcplan is very well suited for reporting metrics and measuring BI. It is good for guys in pharmaceuticals/warehousing and small banks. I would not recommend this for FMCG or retail industries. SMEs will benefit from this product because of its versatility and lots of interfacing to other database tools.
Read full review
Pros
  • You can import data from various sources (i.e. Oracle, Azure SQL...)
  • You can store data models
  • You can elaborate data and create insights
  • Perfect integration with Excel and Power BI
Read full review
  • Endless functionality. With arcplan, you're not limited to a certain set of functions (like with most competitors), but you can think up and add functionality. This includes things like business process management modules, so that your BI really gets embedded into business processes.
  • One core, one skill-set needed, no coding. As an all-round arcplan developer, you can basically do everything. So, even when things get complex, there is no need for external scripts, macros, VBA code, etc. Even the most advanced corporate BI systems are built in arcplan with one skillset!
  • No end user training needed. With arcplan, it's easy to build applications that work purely intuitively. It's also possible to show/hide advanced options, depending on the type of users you define.
  • No data modelling required. Of course, if the business requires it, you can add semantic layers, but you are not forced to do it in all circumstances. I find this a huge advantage over other products, because most business data sources already are logically structured.
  • Multiple data sources can be connected and you're completely free in combining the data in these sources: create your own, or create modules to associate data 'on the fly', whatever you want. You want ETL? No problem. You want to avoid ETL? No problem either.
  • Write-back capabilities: this is critical if you want to really embed BI into your business processes. In BI, information should be actionable: arcplan allows the end user to really take that action.
  • Great developer interface, which makes it also possible for someone with limited technical skills (but high business acumen) to take part in developments.
  • Pricing and licensing. At first glance, arcplan seems not very cheap compared to competitors. However, the licensing model is logical, and there are no hidden costs. Compare that to 'free' products that become very costly as soon as you want to have an enterprise solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • Microsoft Azure Analysis Services is very costly solution and in that price we can get some better business intelligence tool with lot more of capabilities
  • The dashboard or we can say user interface is complex and need time to understand and gain expertise in order for proper working.
  • It needs continuation monitoring which is sometime a big task.
  • Sometime, the tool shows unusual behavior and become unstable, so we need to clear temp files for proper functioning.
Read full review
  • Pricing. Quite on the high side.
  • Not many partners. Had a user in the Philippines and had to support them from here.
  • Training materials are outdated.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We have used the IBM cloud which was truly a specific nightmare for our team. User experience, layout, and design is big for us as it understandably is with many people. Even if any type of program can technically do all that we need it to, we still found our team will not be as motivated or satisfied using it compared to something more visually appealing and smooth.
Read full review
acplan beats Qlik on basically everything, including price. It's technically far superior, provides far better security and unlike Qlik does not require coding when things get complex. arcplan beats Tableau and Yellowfin on capabilities. Tableau and Yellowfin are very good at what they do, but capabilities are limited, unless you call the programmers. arcplan beats SAP BO by being one product, instead of a suite with 10 components using 10 different skill sets. And, as a result, it beats SAP BO hands down on implementation costs and efforts
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Website analytics; We have realized so many benefits like traffic analysis, CRM, click-through funnels, and many more.
  • Aas allows us to do complex calculations and aggregations at slight efforts. It accommodates DAX expression, which in return is simple to apply.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots