TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure App Service vs. Google App Engine

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure App Service

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AThe Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.

    $9.49

    per month

    Google App Engine

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AGoogle App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.

    $0.05

    Per Hour Per Instance

    Pricing
    Azure App ServiceGoogle App Engine
    Editions & Modules
    Shared Environment for dev/test
    $9.49
    per month
    Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test
    $54.75
    per month
    Standard Run production workloads
    $73
    per month
    Premium Enhanced performance and scale
    $146
    per month
    Starting Price
    $0.05
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Max Price
    $0.30
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure App ServiceGoogle App Engine
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFree and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure App ServiceGoogle App Engine
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure App Service
    Azure is some what easy to use and we can learn the azure platform easily. And mainly for students they are giving free credits. So by using the credits we can learn or deploy using that credit
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure App Service
    In terms of deploying your apps, Azure App Service provides a solid foundation. You may use either the Azure command-line interface or the Web Portal to administer these apps. As a whole, I find You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service to be a really difficult …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure App Service
    Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure App Service
    1. We selected Azure over Linode because of the CI/CD integration with DevOps.
    2. Azure has integration with docker containers.
    3. Azure has intehration with Sprint Planning.
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure App Service
    Azure App Service will give you a very solid and strong platform to deploy your applications. It gives you great interfaces to manage those applications either through a Web Portal or the Azure command-line interface. However, I consider Azure overall to be very complex and …
    Incentivized
    Google
    Chose Google App Engine
    Azure App Service is in par with Google App Engine although you may want to use Azure App Service if you are integrating with other Microsoft IT components, for example SQL Server. Google App Engine is great when in long run, you will be using Google cloud components, for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google App Engine
    We prefer Google App Engine over Linode when need to hosting applications for R&D and Testing. Since the deployment has much less configuration.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure App ServiceGoogle App Engine
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Azure App Service and Google App Engine
    Feature
    Azure App Service
    8.0
    4 Ratings
    Google App Engine
    8.7
    31 Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces10.04 Ratings9.017 Ratings
    Scalability10.04 Ratings9.031 Ratings
    Platform management overhead4.14 Ratings9.031 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability5.03 Ratings9.023 Ratings
    Platform access control10.04 Ratings9.030 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration10.04 Ratings8.027 Ratings
    Development environment creation10.04 Ratings9.028 Ratings
    Development environment replication10.03 Ratings8.027 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification8.04 Ratings9.027 Ratings
    Issue recovery6.04 Ratings9.025 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes5.14 Ratings8.028 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure App ServiceGoogle App Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (8 ratings)
    8.0
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.4
    (12 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)