Azure Arc vs. VMware Cloud Director

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Arc
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Azure Arc is a set of technologies that brings Azure security and cloud-native services to hybrid and multicloud environments. It enables the user to secure and govern infrastructure and apps anywhere, build cloud-native apps faster with familiar tools and services to run them on any Kubernetes platform, and modernize the data estate with Azure data and machine-learning services.N/A
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Director (formerly vCloud Director) is a cloud service-delivery platform used by cloud providers to operate and manage cloud-service businesses. The vendor states that by using VMware Cloud Director, cloud providers deliver secure, efficient, and elastic cloud resources to thousands of enterprises and IT teams across the world.N/A
Pricing
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Considered Both Products
Azure Arc
Chose Azure Arc
Azure Arc uses the underlying power of Microsoft Azure, which allows assets across multicloud to be onboarded to Arc platform. It provides monitoring, security, updates in one click in one single platform. It also provides licensing benefits for Windows Server licenses, which …
VMware Cloud Director
Chose VMware Cloud Director
Another option was own scripting or maintaining the end users in the backend (vcenter). This costs to much time to maintain (scripting) and has a big change of a Security breach. It was not an option for us either way.
Chose VMware Cloud Director
Hyper-V is built on a Windows platform that includes services not needed for the virtual environment adding overhead. With vCloud I'm not required to maintain a host OS or it's updates. The requirement to maintain storage devices is no longer needed with vCloud as well.
Chose VMware Cloud Director
vCloud Director is definitely my favorite as far as cloud managers. The only thing that compares is Cisco UCS Director, but it has slightly different functionality and purpose. I understand why a lot of clients still go with vCloud Director even though VMware intends to sunset …
Features
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Arc
9.3
Ratings
7% above category average
VMware Cloud Director
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure ArcVMware Cloud Director
Likelihood to Recommend
I have been amazed by the extra options which Azure Arc offers for SQL server deployment in both Azure infrastructure and on-premise (hybrid) infrastructure. The deployment options range from Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) to Platform as a service (PaaS). Arc-enabled IaaS and PaaS services bring the integration of Azure monitoring and security tools into any customer's local infrastructure and this is amazing
Read full review
For a CSP it's the best choice. For internal uses, even in presence of different business units, it's not so easy and flexible to manage. It assures a high level of multitenancy, often not needed for internal purposes. But it could be used in this case, just not created for these purposes. Network management is great.
Read full review
Pros
  • Azure Monitor metrics
  • Event logs aggregation
  • Integration with Windows Admin Center
Read full review
  • Manages multi-tenancy very well. You can setup resource pools of compute, network, and storage that are independent of each other.
  • Easy to create and manage multiple environments.
  • Has lease management technology and can easily set leases and expire them based on pre-configured time frames.
Read full review
Cons
  • Licensing benefits could use some improvement
  • Update management pricing
  • Security optimization and pricing
Read full review
  • Logging, there is a lot of logging but is not always clear where to look for the right logging.
  • The syncing of policy, you can't see if or what he did/didn't sync and the status of it.
  • More integrations with VMware product (click like Availability)
Read full review
Usability
Azure Arc monitoring is based on a unified procedure which includes the installation and configuration of the Arc agent on any computer/server which is to be onboaded to Arc. The solution is very usable especially when combined with the usage of Windows Admin Center, the HTML5-based unified management console for all our hybrid infrastructure. Many of the best of breed Azure tools and services are available via Azure Arc, when deployed to on-premise servers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Azure Arc uses the underlying power of Microsoft Azure, which allows assets across multicloud to be onboarded to Arc platform. It provides monitoring, security, updates in one click in one single platform. It also provides licensing benefits for Windows Server licenses, which offers premium features like Windows server admin center to manage your windows servers more effectively.
Read full review
Another option was own scripting or maintaining the end users in the backend (vcenter). This costs to much time to maintain (scripting) and has a big change of a Security breach. It was not an option for us either way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It reduces asset management processes
  • Provides centralized monitoring
  • Provides security posture across multi cloud environment
  • Multi Cloud Management
Read full review
  • vCloud Director requires less IT administration. For example, there isn't a need to maintain esx host. or storage administration like creating luns.
  • A negative impact is cost. vCloud Director has a monthly cost for storage, processor core, memory, and licensing.
Read full review
ScreenShots