Microsoft's Azure Backup is a cloud backup service.
$5
Commvault Cloud powered by Metallic AI
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Commvault® Cloud is a cyber resilience platform built to meet the demands of hybrid enterprises. It delivers data security and recovery in the cloud, powered by advanced AI, to help organizations see, manage, and recover data wherever it lives.
Azure Backup, Commvault, Acronis Data Protector, and Veeam Backup are popular backup solutions that offer similar functionality to protect data and applications.Azure Backup vs CommvaultCommvault is a comprehensive data backup and recovery solution that covers everything from …
Azure Backup is cheaper however Veeam is more visually pleasing and allows you to send the backups to other places including Azure, or other competitors remote DR vaults.
Cost and SLA were important [in our] decision to prefer Azure Backup over others. The customization of existing policy with an archive of data was not available in competitors so we had preferred Azure Backup.
Azure Backup works on Azure, the most famous of the cloud systems that the whole world has switched to, which is now a very large part of the Microsoft ecosystem that we have been used to using for years. Therefore, it is less tiring to use the additional service of an …
I won't say Azure Backup stacks up against these mentioned backup solutions, they're just for different approaches/implementations. Depending on your requirements, you may have a mix of Azure Backups for 'simpler' backups and another backup tool for the most complex applications …
Azure Backup is based on the most secure and encrypted cloud storage facility available...Microsoft. They have been doing this a long time and have ironed out all the kinks, leaving only the good and dependable solution in place. Azure Backup is fast also, you do not have major …
When it comes to protecting VM's in Azure, Azure Backup is the way to go versus offerings from Commvault. If you only have the infrastructure in Azure, Azure Backup is the much more attractive solution because it's built into the product, offers ease of configuration, and ties …
We were already a customer with CommVault and we enjoyed the strong support and quick responses. Overall the complete collection of features and options worked best with our environment and our current hardware it was quite a strong contender. Comparing it to OneDrive …
TCO was the one of the major factors in our decision, Commvault did have it over the other products in there dashboard and the feature set, we have used Commvault Cloud in the past for other backup products and never had any issues. Both Veeam and Acronis have pros and cons …
I think costs are at very good level if we compare Commvault Complete Data Protection with EMC running Data Domains, howewer de duplication rates are a liitle bit lower on Commvault Complete Data Protection vs Data Domain. On VMware backup Veem rules, but Commvault Complete …
Commvault Complete Data Protection supports Tape backup and Druva does not support tape based backup Commvault Complete Data Protection lets use own cloud account for backup storage to cloud Druva does not allow customer own account
Metallic was the only system that had everything that we wanted and was consistently able to show us the benefits or their organization. Rubrik had similar features but in the end, they came up short in the ability to backup all of our workloads. We also liked that Metallic was …
We chose Metallic Backup & Recovery over Backupify as we were looking for a SaaS solution to get this done. We didnt want any further hardware in our environment and we wanted something that can be accessed and used anywhere a web browser is. We also went with Metallic as it …
Many other backup and recovery platforms have their strengths and weaknesses. They might specialize in backing up VMs but fail to adequately backup Oracle databases, or do well in the cloud, but not so well on-premise. In my opinion, Commvault handles the variety of clients and …
The option for replacement started with the need to replace our old backup software.
Commvault [Complete Backup & Recovery] brought us the possibility of reducing disaster recovery time, implementing a friendlier interface, a higher rate of data deduplication, the possibility …
Not all the backup tools have the ability to backup directly to Cloud (Blobs, S3, etc.). It can be a little controversial, but when dealing with 900TB of user data to be backed up you don't have much options. When doing this backup to tapes, we had 2 giant Tape Libraries …
We switched from Veritas NetBackup, because we had two parallel environments. Combining allowed us to cover more targets and make better use of centralized assets & staff. Licensing of Commvault was simpler at the time we deployed, and Commvault has continued to evolve their …
About the same. Quest support is not as good. Rapid Recovery has Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery beat on email restores, but Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery is a better overall product. Rapid Recovery was better before Quest took them over. I have needed to use …
From a feature set Commvault is the most complete of all the products. Support is also fantastic when it's needed. The ability to implement on your own kit, on an appliance based solution or even in the cloud makes it extremely flexible and it can scale as an enterprise grows …
Why Commvault? Well, working with backup software in the last 25 years, I decided on Commvault, for being a safe, reliable tool with excellent technical support and was for sure the tool to cover all our needs. First we started with our physical servers and the following year …
Commvault simplified application and management. Increased recovery times by 3x and allowed us to focus on higher-value priorities and not constantly be muddling around on a daily basis to get ready for the incoming backups each night. Another advantage is knowing when a …
The other solutions weren't granular enough and suffer from resource issues and false positives when errors creep up. Their support staff has communication barriers.
Commvault beats CA's Arcserve is every single area. It was a very straightforward choice for us to move from Arcserve due to reliable backup and recovery we get from Commvault. We haven't looked back at Arcserve since 2013.
Commvault is our flagship data management platform. We have a large Avamar presence but chose Commvault as our go-forward solution because of the array of features and capabilities that Commvault has that other products do not. We needed a full suite of data management tools …
We are constantly looking at ways to save money in initial purchases, maintenance, hardware, and efforts to maintain/update our environment. Commvault continually hits high marks and keeps other vendors out of our company. The cost to move over really isn't worth the …
Workload options for protecting client workloads are extensive and reliable. The pedigree of the application itself is solid, been around a long time, and they've learned a lot of lessons. The support structure for when we need support or help is superior to many other …
Commvault's use of deduplication and compression saves us terabytes of on the wire data nightly. We have nightly backups occurring at over a hundred different locations and Commvault is able to manage it all as a complete system.
The licensing costs for Hedvig seemed to be cost prohibitive. The
Commvault HyperScale was evaluated and briefly tested and appears to be a
very good approach to the remote offices we have here at DaVita across
In the past it has been necessary to leverage multiple products to provide a complete data protection solution. Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery has been able to mirror the functions of competitive products while increasing functionality and management. Commvault Complete …
By using Azure Backup, you can back up your NAS device you use locally as a file server, virtual machines you use in [a] production environment, critical databases, and everything you can think of. I do not know if there are scenarios that are not suitable, it meets all my needs.
Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery does its job well in any type of environment. The possibilities of backing up different types of environments with VMs, SQL, File Servers and their restore and disaster recovery process are extremely useful for any company.
It has a reasonable cost of implementation so I don't think it is the best idea for backing up smaller companies or simpler operations. The cost benefit may not pay.
Azure Backup is fast! Coupled with the fact that Microsoft created Azure and Windows - these two operate phenomenally together!
Administering the backups inside of Azure is a breeze. The ability to mount, restore entire backups, or recover files, has been made very easy. You do not have to download any media to recover something, you do this all in the cloud and it gets mounted in Microsoft's systems. Making this process less than a quarter of the time you would have spent with your 'other' backup solutions.
Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery provides complete auditing. Having worked with many products in the past, most fell short on reporting. In particular reporting on restores. Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery provides detailed information on operations that were performed, the account performing the operation and where was the data placed.
The flexibility of the product allows it to be more of a framework than a rigid application. By leveraging vendor specific API's, such as NetApp SnapVault/SnapMirror access, stronger integration and a more reliable service is produced. The workflow functionality and ability to utilize personal scripts helps administrators perform developer functions.
Support for aging technologies is a challenge for any large institution. Maintaining the ability to support old solutions, even in a limited capacity, is more desirable than bringing in a secondary solution or not support it at all.
Backup vaults should ask if you want to send notifications when you first set it up, there have been a couple of times when I noticed a month later that, backup job failures were not configured to send email notifications.
It is serving it's purpose and for companies that have a smaller IT staff, it is not time consuming to manage. Support for the product when needed has been very good and they are responsive when tickets are opened for support. The product is scalable so as we grow we can easily increase the resources as needed on the backend.
Azure backup is easy to implement, accessible by using the web portal GUI, and has the ability to restore at the file level or the complete VM. We have experienced zero issues with the backup process or performing file-level restorations. We have not restored an entire VM to date.
It's a 9 only because it is very complex to administer. It would be good if they could transform the management console to be more user friendly, while keeping its functionality and wide range of features. But it is a very complete tool, with a lot of fine adjustments to your backups, thresholds, policies, backup destinations. We're really satisfied with Commvault protecting our environment.
One of the differentials of the solution is the high level of guarantee and support of the Azure Backup solution. Microsoft is a reference in a technology company with a highly trained support team and helps us with any questions or technical problems with the tool. Service is fast and efficient with trained engineers.
The real winner of this company and application is its staff of support engineers and the management. Seriously, I could hate the application and despise using it and would still subscribe and deploy 100% across the company. No other company works as hard for its users as Commvault. Having a solid application on top of this is more than anyone can ask for.
Plan well and make sure you collect all the required information and details before going for implementation. Organize it in step by step or break the setup into different modules to make it simple.
The cost, not only in the short term, but in our long-term calculations.
Even in need of improvements, the pre-sale and post-sale support is very good.
The ease, like many Microsoft products about scheduling backups, the friendly interface, the fact that there is no need for an expensive resource dedicated to this backup and some other details, made us choose Azure Backup.
Many other backup and recovery platforms have their strengths and weaknesses. They might specialize in backing up VMs but fail to adequately backup Oracle databases, or do well in the cloud, but not so well on-premise. In my opinion, Commvault handles the variety of clients and situations in most enterprise datacenters the best with features for efficient and effective backup policies, such as deduplication for managing storage of backups and use of hardware and software snapshots to minimize impact to production storage and compute resources.
Disaster Recovery. We wouldn't be able to do it at all without Commvault.
We are looking continually for data management opportunities to use Commvault instead of other products. To date that hasn't been significant for us much as I personally would like to see inside our company.