Azure CDN vs. Optimole

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure CDN
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers a content delivery network, Azure CDN.N/A
Optimole
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Optimole provides optimal image: storage, compression, delivery. Because managing and resizing image files drains storage, processing resources, and development time, Optimole stores, handles and scales a site's images with 80% less size while aiming to keep them looking just as good.
$22.99
per month
Pricing
Azure CDNOptimole
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$22.99
per month
Business
$109
per month
Custom
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure CDNOptimole
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure CDNOptimole
User Ratings
Azure CDNOptimole
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure CDNOptimole
Likelihood to Recommend
Azure CDN has at hand an infinity of applications and tools to implement in your system and have better control of your data in a clean and secure platform on the web, we recommend this program since the percentage of solutions provided by this program is very high and find a way to make each user's job easier.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • New websites can be boosted up quickly
  • Easily scalable according to our performance requirements
  • Easy integration with other Azure services
  • You only pay for what you need
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • For the longest time they didn't have a robust SDK. They have one now, but it could be better.
  • The different flavors of Azure CDN (Akamai, Verizon, etc) have different costs, but not well differentiated features. Might be confusing to new users.
  • I'm not overly familiar with it, but AWS does have a programmability in their CDN offering (Lambda @ Edge) and Azure doesn't seem to have an equivalent (Azure Functions is region-specific).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I give it 9/10 rating because it solved my problem by Caching my website content on global servers to load faster.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Great support from the team whenever we're stuck. Very proactive in resolving issues and also making changes as per the requirements of the organization.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We did not evaluate any other CDN's before we selected Azure. We heavily use Azure for our development and infrastructure efforts so choosing the Azure CDN was easy. The only thing we compared it to was standing up a Windows Server VM and pointing a CDN URL to it allowing it to serve as a file server, which was much more cumbersome.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Azure CDN reduced origin instance load by removing the need to constantly serve large numbers of static files, meaning applications can be deployed with smaller/fewer instances.
  • Azure CDN reduces apparent load times to customers by serving cached files out of POPs in the local region of those clients, instead of requiring those clients to make multiple, lengthy requests through to the origin servers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots