TrustRadius

Azure Container Instances vs. DigitalOcean Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Container Instances
Score 5.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud.
$0.01
Per GB Per Hour
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
DigitalOcean's Managed Kubernetes is designed for simple and cost effective container orchestration.N/A
Pricing
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
Memory
$0.00533
Per GB Per Hour
vCPU
$0.04860
Per vCPU
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Considered Both Products
Azure Container Instances

No answer on this topic

DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Chose DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean is the most affordable and straightforward of the hosted Kubernetes options we evaluated. All features that we require are supported without an excess of complication of extraneous features. Straightforward billing is also very important for us in comparison to the …
Best Alternatives
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Container InstancesDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
DO Kubernetes is well-suited for: - deploying APIs - deploying workers - log collection and analysis (ie ELK stack) - deploying Helm charts and anything that can be mapped on to K8s concepts Less appropriate for anything requiring no public Internet access (ie VPC only). Less appropriate for anything requiring integration with the DO app platform via VPC, at the moment.
CO
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Hosted dashboard
  • Hosted container registry
  • Horizontal auto-scaling
  • LetsEncrypt SSL termination
CO
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Option for internal VPC-only deployment
  • Better integration with cloud firewall
  • Better integration with DO App platform via VPC
CO
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
DigitalOcean is the most affordable and straightforward of the hosted Kubernetes options we evaluated. All features that we require are supported without an excess of complication of extraneous features. Straightforward billing is also very important for us in comparison to the Big Three cloud hosts, which have very complicated billing practices. DigitalOcean also provides a platform with very little vendor lock-in.
CO
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Excellent uptime
  • Low cost for provided value
  • Good integration with the rest of the DO platform to provide additional value
CO
Read full review
ScreenShots