Azure Container Instances vs. GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

Azure Container Instances

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Container Instances	Score 5.9 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud.	$0.01 Per GB Per Hour
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued	Score 7.1 out of 10	N/A	GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.	N/A

Pricing

Azure Container Instances

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

Editions & Modules

Memory: $0.00533
Per GB Per Hour
vCPU: $0.04860
Per vCPU

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure Container Instances	GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Springs.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure Container Instances	GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

User Ratings
	Azure Container Instances	GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Container Instances	GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Container hosting, cloud virtualization Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Provide more options at lower costs It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience; Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set. Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots