Azure Cost Management vs. ProsperOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Cost Management
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Cost Management tracks resource usage and manages costs across all your clouds with a single, unified view, and access rich operational and financial insights to make informed decisions.N/A
ProsperOps
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
ProsperOps is a fully automated, multi-cloud cost optimization platform for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Eliminating cloud waste and managing spend is one of the most persistent challenges for FinOps teams. Cloud usage is inherently elastic, but the financial instruments used to manage cost like Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Committed Use Discounts are rigid. ProsperOps bridges this gap by integrating automated rate optimization with intelligent workload…N/A
Pricing
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Considered Both Products
Azure Cost Management
Chose Azure Cost Management
The main thing is the cost is generated in real-time and we have more detailed reports and great visualization to understand where we are spending our money and which resources can be optimized and plan the development accordingly. There is not much difference in price but …
ProsperOps
Chose ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of …
Best Alternatives
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Cost ManagementProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
A highly capable Azure Cloud platform and the best Cloud resource and cost management and data analytical capability are excellent. Azure Cost Management provides amazing capacity and performance analytics effectively and quite an easy tool Cloud efficiency optimization and its interface are very easy and friendly for the new users to get familiar with the tool easily.
Read full review
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
Read full review
Pros
  • Cloud cost and resource management.
  • Analytics are profitable.
  • The accurate on cost calculation.
Read full review
  • The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
  • It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
  • It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Read full review
Cons
  • If the user could set up how often it reports or checks the budget.
  • Add more conditions would be nice.
  • Add more report views.
Read full review
  • The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
  • When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The main thing is the cost is generated in real-time and we have more detailed reports and great visualization to understand where we are spending our money and which resources can be optimized and plan the development accordingly. There is not much difference in price but Azure cost management provides more features and services.
Read full review
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Excellent analytical features for easy planning and budgeting.
  • Effective project cost and supply management tool.
  • Projects access and control managements are superb.
Read full review
  • Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
  • Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
  • As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProsperOps Screenshots

Screenshot of