Azure CycleCloud vs. IBM Turbonomic

Azure CycleCloud

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure CycleCloud	N/A	N/A	Azure CycleCloud is an enterprise-friendly tool for orchestrating and managing High Performance Computing (HPC) environments on Azure. With CycleCloud, users can provision infrastructure for HPC systems, deploy familiar HPC schedulers, and automatically size the infrastructure in order to run jobs efficiently at any scale. Through CycleCloud, users can create different types of file systems and mount them to the compute cluster nodes to support HPC workloads. Azure CycleCloud is targeted at HPC…	$0.02 per hour
IBM Turbonomic	Score9.3 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by cloud, infrastructure operations, and architecture to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. One of the key features of IBM Turbonomic is its ability to continuously adjust application resources in real time. By monitoring resource utilization and application performance,…	N/A

Pricing

Azure CycleCloud

IBM Turbonomic

No answers on this topic

IBM® Turbonomic On-Prem: Varies - Request a Quote
per month IBM Turbonomic On-prem optimizes data center resources in real time, ensuring app performance at the lowest cost by aligning infrastructure supply with dynamic application demand.
IBM® Turbonomic Cloud Standard: Varies - Request a Quote
per month For customers with more than USD 1.6 million in annual cloud spend or 50 Managed Virtual Servers (MVS) or greater
IBM® Turbonomic Hybrid Standard: Varies - Request a Quote
per month Advanced hybrid cloud optimization capabilities for customers with 200 managed virtual servers (MVS) or more

Pricing Offerings
Azure CycleCloud	IBM Turbonomic
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

Optional

—

Volume discounting available.

Features

Azure CycleCloud

IBM Turbonomic

Comparison of Cloud Management features of Azure CycleCloud and IBM Turbonomic
Feature	Azure CycleCloud - Ratings	IBM Turbonomic 6.7 6 Ratings
Cloud Management Security	00 Ratings	6.25 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration	00 Ratings	6.25 Ratings
Cost Management	00 Ratings	7.96 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring	00 Ratings	7.36 Ratings
Governance and Compliance	00 Ratings	6.86 Ratings
Resource Management	00 Ratings	7.35 Ratings
Systems Integration	00 Ratings	5.65 Ratings

User Ratings
	Azure CycleCloud	IBM Turbonomic
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.8 (138 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (24 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (20 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (6 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (25 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (3 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.7 (18 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (2 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (4 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)
Professional Services	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (3 ratings)