Azure Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Databricks
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure Databricks is a service available on Microsoft's Azure platform and suite of products. It provides the latest versions of Apache Spark so users can integrate with open source libraries, or spin up clusters and build in a fully managed Apache Spark environment with the global scale and availability of Azure. Clusters are set up, configured, and fine-tuned to ensure reliability and performance without the need for monitoring. The solution includes autoscaling and auto-termination to improve…N/A
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Pricing
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Considered Both Products
Azure Databricks
Chose Azure Databricks
Against all the tools I have used, Azure Databricks is by far the most superior of them all! Why, you ask? The UI is modern, the features are never ending and they keep adding new features. And to quote Apple, "It just works!"
Far ahead of the competition, the delta lakehouse …
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Google Cloud may be a good place but it is not as easy to understand as IBM Watson is. Google Cloud has a lot of things and it is terrifying for a beginner. You need hours of specialization for that. On other hand, anyone can start using IBM Waston just by the following …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
  • Data ingestion
  • Batch data processing
  • Built-in connectors to Python
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Anaconda and Jupyter Notebook
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is a well-established product that supports on-demand notebooks, data pipelines, and so on, however, it also comes with the learning overhead of the whole AWS stack. It does allow per-defined models, but the benefit of using IBM Watson Studio is that users are …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Organization of data, use of data, manage the data, visualize the data is easy. Use of the environment for any project. We can use python or R or Scala in the notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
It provides better user experience. All your data on cloud and does not take up space locally.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I think they are very similar but IBM Watson is not good enough yet to pay for the services that I can already get from Jupyter Notebook.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Easy to use, but still requires a lot of coding to use. There is no ranking of models used and models are not persistent, which means you have to keep running the models again every time you leave the session. The filesystem is clunky and need to keep authorizing Google Drive …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As it offers more features and can be used for several applications like AI,ML,DS etc.,
Chose IBM Watson Studio
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
We didn’t evaluate other products but we liked what we saw in Watson Studio.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
As an IBM Business Partner, we are financially incentivized to recommend and deploy IBM solutions where it makes sense to do so for the customer. Against other solutions, few have the governance and security that IBM offers, which is essential for any kind of work in highly …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
They are close, but I feel Alteryx is more of an enhanced Jupyter capability, whereas WS is more of an enterprise solution for multiple teams
Chose IBM Watson Studio
I am excited with the roadmap of Watson Studio incorporating SPSS Modeler in the offerings.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS Sagemaker is new, and I personally think it's better than sliced bread. There's very little set up to do. Watson Studio needs to up its game against Sagemaker.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
AWS stacks up very favourably against Watson Studio, and in fact this is what the customer ultimately chose over Watson Studio after an evaluation period due to the sophistication, maturity, security, and capabilities of the AWS components. The downsides of AWS are having to …
Chose IBM Watson Studio
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
Features
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources6.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
MDM Integration8.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
6.4
Ratings
27% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Visualization5.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis6.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors7.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.5
Ratings
0% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DatabricksIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
Having access to all databases and tables in one place is what has helped me and my team to function better. The in built functionality/access to SQL and Python is definitely an added bonus! The icing on the cake is the ability to export your data into an Excel spreadsheet for additional analysis. If you have less to no working knowledge of SQL or Python, its better to look at alternatives.
Read full review
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Pros
  • Consistently great performance when dealing with huge scale data with the help of spark architecture
  • Magic commands such as spark sql, pyspark, scala . This comes really handy in day to day work
  • Integration with other Azure services is super smooth and robust
Read full review
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Cons
  • Intuitive interface
  • Ease of use
  • Providing FAQ or QRGs
Read full review
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Usability
Based on my extensive use of Azure Databricks for the past 3.5 years, it has evolved into a beautiful amalgamation of all the data domains and needs. From a data analyst, to a data engineer, to a data scientist, it jas got them all! Being language agnostic and focused on easy to use UI based control, it is a dream to use for every Data related personnel across all experience levels!
Read full review
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Against all the tools I have used, Azure Databricks is by far the most superior of them all! Why, you ask? The UI is modern, the features are never ending and they keep adding new features. And to quote Apple, "It just works!" Far ahead of the competition, the delta lakehouse platform also fares better than it counterparts of Iceberg implementation or a loosely bound Delta Lake implementation of Synapse
Read full review
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The support team is amazing, they help you at every stage of the projects, from sales to delivery.
  • On a framework level, it has had an amazing impact and has reduced the clients overall data platform costs by a staggering 65%
  • There has been a 40% Manual work requirement on average for the clients when they move to Azure Databricks Data Platform
Read full review
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
ScreenShots