| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Azure DevOps Server | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | AzureDevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is a test management and application lifecycle management tool, from Microsoft's Visual Studio offerings. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A |
 OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| Azure DevOps Server | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Azure DevOps Server Before Team Foundation Server (TFS) / Microsoft Test Manager, we were using HP Quality Center and I am now working for a client that uses HP ALM. It was not as easy to find requirements because they were imported from another database which if the server for that software and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose OpenText ALM/Quality Center There is a desire from some areas in the company to move to TFS and Microsoft Test Manager. The issue with the MS tool set is that they are more geared for developers rather than testers and business users, so great for Agile (assuming developers do carry out testing) but if … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OpenText ALM/Quality Center For requirements, we have also reviewed Blue Print, Version One, etc. Currently, the go forward solution is being decided. Whatever the final requirements application is, integration with HP ALM will be done to support traceability. For testing, there are a large number of … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure DevOps Server | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 6.0 | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | 7.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | 1.0 |
