TrustRadius

Azure Load Testing vs. BlazeMeter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Load Testing
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Load Testing is a fully managed load-testing service built for Azure that makes it easier to generate high-scale load and identify app performance bottlenecks. The service enables developers and testers to generate high-scale load and run simulations that reveal actionable insights into app performance, scalability, and capacity with a fully managed load-testing service. Create tests quickly without prior knowledge of load testing tools, or upload existing Apache JMeter scripts. Users can…
$0.08
additional VUH
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
Pricing
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Editions & Modules
Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 9,950+ Virtual User Hours
$0.075
additional VUH
Virtual User Hour (VUH) additional usage - 0 - 9,950 Virtual User Hours
$0.15
per additional VUH
Load Testing Resource
$10
per month includes 50 Virtual User Hours (VUH) per month
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Considered Both Products
Azure Load Testing

No answer on this topic

BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
Best Alternatives
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Load TestingBlazeMeter
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It required good knowledge to analyze BlazeMeter report.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots