TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure NetApp Files vs. IBM Cloud File Storage

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure NetApp Files

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AAzure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers.

    $0.02

    per month

    IBM Cloud File Storage

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud provides a File Storage service allows the user to deploy and customize flash-backed NFS-based file storage from 25 GB to 12,000 GB capacity with up to 48,000 IOPS.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Editions & Modules
    Restore
    $0.02/GiB
    per month
    Backup
    $0.05/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Daily - Replication frequency is once a day
    $0.11/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Hourly - Replication frequency is every 1 hour
    $0.12/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Minutes - Replication frequency is every 10 mins
    $0.14/GiB
    per month
    Standard Storage
    $0.14746 per GiB
    per month
    Premium Storage
    $0.29419 per GiB
    per month
    Ultra Storage
    $0.39274 per GiB
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAzure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Considered Both Products
    NetApp
    Chose Azure NetApp Files
    Azure NetApp Files is very well integrated with Microsoft Azure, we use the same request methods that everyone knows from Azure. NetApp and Microsoft has built a very efficient solution that allows you to transfer virtually any service to the Microsoft public cloud. Azure …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Azure NetApp Files and IBM Cloud File Storage
    Feature
    Azure NetApp Files
    7.7
    8 Ratings
    IBM Cloud File Storage
    8.5
    39 Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.18 Ratings9.737 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling7.18 Ratings8.836 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing8.17 Ratings8.135 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates8.07 Ratings7.631 Ratings
    Monitoring tools7.18 Ratings8.037 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images8.06 Ratings8.133 Ratings
    Operating system support8.18 Ratings9.636 Ratings
    Security controls7.18 Ratings9.437 Ratings
    Automation8.01 Ratings7.030 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure NetApp FilesIBM Cloud File Storage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.8
    (40 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)