Azure Pipelines vs. Grunt.js

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Pipelines
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Users can automate builds and deployments with Azure Pipelines. Build, test, and deploy Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++, .NET, Android, and iOS apps. Run in parallel on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Azure Pipelines can be purchased standalone, but it is also part of Azure DevOps Services agile development planning and CI/CD suite.N/A
Grunt.js
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Grunt (grunt.js) is a JavaScript task runner, providing the user with automation to eliminate repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc. It is available free and open source under the MIT license.N/A
Pricing
Azure PipelinesGrunt.js
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure PipelinesGrunt.js
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure PipelinesGrunt.js
User Ratings
Azure PipelinesGrunt.js
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure PipelinesGrunt.js
Likelihood to Recommend
With a fully Microsoft Azure based workflow - Azure Pipelines makes absolute sense. Azure Pipelines are robust and work very well with SonarQube for test coverage and are shared with our developers. This prevents the developers for pushing code without unit tests across our backend and frontend platforms. We have reduced our instances of manual regression tests especially when there are multiple teams working across the same repositories.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Code Integration/Code Deployment
  • Azure Engine Auto Scaling Up with help of Pipeline
  • Managing Version Control and deploy in rollback with just one click
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Error messaging when team members don't have permissions
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then just by few changes we can deploy it onto Azure, AWS, Google anywhere so we found it more convenient
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We don't have to deploy changes manually
  • But because of this that we automated some tasks, we need to be still aware of some edge cases we can meet and which can cause a pipelines failures
  • We can deploy changes pretty fast
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots