TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Test Plans vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Test Plans

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAzure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A

    OpenText ALM/Quality Center

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Test PlansOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Test PlansOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Azure Test PlansOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Azure Test Plans and OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Feature
    Azure Test Plans
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting9.36 Ratings00 Ratings
    Defect management7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure Test PlansOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    7.1
    (31 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)