Azure Test Plans vs. TestRail

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Test Plans
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure Test Plans is an exploratory test toolkit available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services. It enables manual testing for users, so that they can plan, execute, and track scripted tests with actionable defects and end-to-end traceability. Assess quality throughout the development lifecycle by testing your desktop or web applications. It is available with Azure DevOps Services.N/A
TestRail
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.
$35
per month billed annually per user
Pricing
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional Cloud
$35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud
$38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud
$71
per month billed annually per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Considered Both Products
Azure Test Plans
Chose Azure Test Plans
I have not used any comparable software to Azure in the same setting. This question does not apply to my review of the software. I have also not encountered any bugs or inadequacies that would prompt us to look into replacing Azure Test Plans as our software of choice for …
Chose Azure Test Plans
It was basically the business decision to use Azure Test Plans as we were moving to Azure from Amazon Cloud Services.
Chose Azure Test Plans
Since we were using Azure DevOps, Test Plans were built-in on the Azure ecosystem the same that we were using to reduce the adoption time and we don't have to install an external tool for this purpose.
Chose Azure Test Plans
Test rail feels quite dated compared to Azure Test plans and Devops as a whole. Functionality and ease of use is actually night and day.
The ability to create structured test plans with ease that can be traced and attached to Epics and stories with relevant tasks allows the …
Chose Azure Test Plans
We're doing a full continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), continuous testing (CT), security, delivery, and monitoring. They have been lately adding features to the services on a regular basis. Every two weeks, they add functionality to Azure DevOps Services to …
TestRail
Chose TestRail
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and …
Features
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Test Plans
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
TestRail
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Centralized test management8.80 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules8.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Test execution reporting9.30 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Defect management7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Test PlansTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
It works well for express test case implementation with a short duration. You can define the tests for two weeks and run the activities documenting the software errors and fixes to control the effectiveness of DevOps. The graphic reports give the idea of the backlog phases advances and errors detected. It needs improvement if you have a large test project and need to design financial budgets and control over costs of the test plan.
Read full review
Well suited - where you have a set of cases defined say for regression and then you can mark them as Pass/Fail/Skipped, etc. If you wish to present the impact of certain set of new features, bug fixes,etc, you can use this tool Not well suited- where the user is naive and don’t have much understanding of test reporting tools as this tool is slightly difficult to learn at a glance
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration with Azure Boards
  • Integration with Visual Studio 2022
  • Automation using Pipelines and releases
  • Real time dashboards
  • Integration with code repositories
Read full review
  • Beautiful and productive UI.
  • Nice filtering system allowing me to find what I need quickly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Graphic definition of the the Work Break Down Structure
  • Gantt Chart to check the activity dependance and flow of the process
  • Basic cost module to design test budgets.
Read full review
  • UI has a lot scope of improvement
  • Uploading of test screenshots and managing them can be more effective
  • User experience can be improved
  • Tracking of tests can be more simplified
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Test rail feels quite dated compared to Azure Test plans and Devops as a whole. Functionality and ease of use is actually night and day.
The ability to create structured test plans with ease that can be traced and attached to Epics and stories with relevant tasks allows the system to feel superior in everyway compared to Test rail which had a slow web interface
Read full review
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Typically the sprints themselves and managing the tasks have essentially eliminated our need for reporting.
  • The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure DevOps are high-level protection. Protection is very important to the customers to prevent eavesdropping.
Read full review
  • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
  • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
  • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
Read full review
ScreenShots