TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Balsamiq

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ABalsamiq is a wireframing tool that helps lean product teams turn early ideas into clear, actionable direction. The tool helps product managers, founders, and engineers worldwide share concepts, reduce rework, and build better products.

    $12

    per month (up to 2 projects)

    InVision

    Score5.7 out of 10
    N/AInVision is a collaborative design and prototyping platform with features such as freehand drafting mode and interactive mockups, collaboration, idea management, user testing, and integration with Slack and other collaboration tools. According to the vendor, 1 million designers are using the free version.

    $0

    Pricing
    BalsamiqInVision
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Free
    $0
    Pro
    $7.75
    per user/per month
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BalsamiqInVision
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPay per project, not per user—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BalsamiqInVision
    Considered Both Products
    Balsamiq
    Chose Balsamiq
    InVision integrates well with Photoshop but Balsamiq has a much more intuitive pick-up-and-play quality that makes it a useful entry tool to marketing teams just getting their feet wet in the design process. The standardized layout and methodology also gives it an edge if you …
    Incentivized
    Chose Balsamiq
    We have used some other alternatives and Balsamiq is the best one for fastest results.
    InVision and Justinmind both work very well and have great tools for collaboration and making interactive mockups. With Justinmind, I have done some app mockups that felt almost functional …
    Incentivized
    Chose Balsamiq
    While I love these other tools for many different reasons, Balsamiq is the tool I use for low-fidelity wireframing every time. It’s the most simple and easy-to-use out of the bunch, and it gets the job done without a ton of effort and time required. In the early stages of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Balsamiq
    Creating digital wireframes in Photoshop is a nightmare. Photoshop was not really designed for this purpose. It doesn't have good collaboration options and it doesn't allow pattern libraries, which are essential for consistency and efficiency. We use UXPin and Axure for some …
    Incentivized
    Chose Balsamiq
    Balsamiq is a quite simple tool; but does exactly what was designed for, it helps with creating mockups, wireframes, and flows. Its simplicity works great for people who are not designers but need to visually represent their ideas. Low-fidelity wireframes work really well in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Balsamiq
    The Pen tool in Paper is definitely a happy middle between Balsamiq and actual paper prototyping. It has the advantage of being able to copy/paste a section that has already been designed - but even there selecting a specific section is hard - balsamiq's sections are more …
    Incentivized
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Chose InVision
    Balsamiq is a better tool for interactive prototyping and dynamic transition. InVision is definitely better for handling various designs, separated by projects and shared with different access levels across multiple organizations.
    Incentivized
    Chose InVision
    InVision works seamlessly and easily when sharing and requesting comments from others. Other products I've used like Balsamiq and Dropbox (earlier versions) provided online displays of work, but no easy way to collect feedback or quickly update. InVision provides enterprise …
    Incentivized
    Chose InVision
    Axure is expensive, and there's a much bigger then you get with InVision. I also feel like the finished prototype just never looks as nice. I do still use Balsamiq on occasion, that's the best option when you want to create something quickly, to communicate a simple idea. …
    Incentivized
    Chose InVision
    Axure is too expensive and often an overkill in time and effort to create a clickthrough.
    Flinto is nice for interactions, but often times for workflow Invision is just easier to use.
    Pixate has a little bit of a learning curve similar to Axure, but not as powerful.
    Incentivized
    Chose InVision
    InVision's design is much more polished and seamless due to its apps on mobile and web. They are very easy to learn and gather feedback compared to Sketch or Principle. Although these features are quickly coming to the other apps, InVision has an upper hand at the moment with …
    Incentivized
    Chose InVision
    We compared Invision to MarvelApp, Notism, and ViewFlux before purchasing. Admittedly, it has been quite a while since we made that purchase decision, so these platforms may have changed significantly. However, at the time of purchase, we went with Invision because of its …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    BalsamiqInVision
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (31 ratings)
    8.0
    (48 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (4 ratings)