Balsamiq vs. UXPin

Balsamiq

106 Reviews and Ratings

UXPin

21 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Balsamiq	Score7.6 out of 10	N/A	Balsamiq is a wireframing tool that helps lean product teams turn early ideas into clear, actionable direction. The tool helps product managers, founders, and engineers worldwide share concepts, reduce rework, and build better products.	$12 per month (up to 2 projects)
UXPin	Score7.9 out of 10	N/A	UXPin is a UX design platform with wireframing, prototyping and interactive mockup features.	N/A

Pricing

Balsamiq

UXPin

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Balsamiq	UXPin
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

Pay per project, not per user

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Balsamiq	UXPin
Considered Both Products	Balsamiq Elizabeth Coppinger Senior Business Analyst in Marketing at Lucid Agency (Marketing and Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Balsamiq Creating digital wireframes in Photoshop is a nightmare. Photoshop was not really designed for this purpose. It doesn't have good collaboration options and it doesn't allow pattern libraries, which are essential for consistency and efficiency. We use UXPin and Axure for some … Incentivized Helpful? Pooja Sawant UX Researcher/Usability at zeal (Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Balsamiq Axure vs Balsamiq. I would pick Axure over Balsamiq. The only con is there could be a learning curve to Axure. Sketch gives more interactivity over Balsamiq but is limited to Mac users. UXPin has easier palettes to move around than Balsamiq but Balsamiq is easier to use than UXPi… Incentivized Helpful?	Uxpin Verified User Chose UXPin Between UXPin and Balsamiq, I think UXPin gives you better control over the designs and iterations. UXPin seems to continuously iterate on their own product to make it better. I like how UXPin fits in nicely with my workflow. Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Nickulas Director User Experience Design at Fidelity Investments (Financial Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose UXPin The first thing I’ll say is the learning curve is way lighter on UXPin. Also UXPin updates their app, and performance routinely and adds new features based on community needs. It’s the first web-based tool that outputs code rendered in the browser from a design created in a … Incentivized Helpful? Charlie Chauvin Lead Designer at White Lion Interactive (Internet, 11-50 employees) Chose UXPin I went through several tools trying to find something that was easy to use and made me faster. Visio was such a pain at creating something reusable to make me faster, too much building. Axure and Balsamiq looked like great options but were too cumbersome for my needs and I … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Balsamiq	UXPin
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (31 ratings)	2.1 (11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (2 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (1 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)