Chose Bannersnack
In my opinion Canva > Bannersnack as of 2023. The features in BannerSnack are very similar to Canva, but long term they appear to be shutting down BannerSnack entirely.
Bannersnack vs. Convert Experiences
Bannersnack vs. Convert Experiences
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bannersnack | N/A | Bannersnack is a banner making technology from the company of the same name in San Francisco. | N/A | |
 Convert Experiences | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers features and support to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, sequential testing, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), dynamic triggers, complex goal tracking, and a secure API. It includes 90+ out-of-the box integrations in a… | $299 per month 100k tested users per month |
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 1. Annual contract or monthly payments available (40% discount for annual pricing). 2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Bannersnack |  Convert Experiences  Aleksander Lach Conversion Rate Optimization Specialist Chose Convert Experiences Three words: value for money. In a due diligence comparison, Convert Experiences came up more than twice less expensive than the nearest competitor, while offering more product features, better performance and a quick response time with support/sales agents that actually …  Jörg Dennis Krüger CEO (Chief Executive Officer) Chose Convert Experiences Excellent value for the price. Straightforward to use. Very reliable.  Art Bukowski CRO, UX and GA specialist Chose Convert Experiences Convert has the best JS code editor for advanced users (and developers). It doesn't have as great integration with GA as Google Optimize, but it also doesn't have a limit to 5 tests at one time. It's also much easier to use than Optimizely.  Kamila Philip President Chose Convert Experiences Optimizely and Google Optimize  Abby Reddy, CLU Co-Founder and CMO Chose Convert Experiences Convert is considerably more robust and stable.  Scot Chandler Senior Consultant Chose Convert Experiences Although not as robust as Adobe Target, Convert fills the niche with solid functionality at a great price. Comparable to Optimizely and far above Google Optimize.  Dan Procter Managing Director Chose Convert Experiences Convert Experiences has a better UI, better reporting and is a faster platform.  Matt Beischel Founder & CEO Chose Convert Experiences Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room …  Ken Hanson Growth Lead Chose Convert Experiences There were a number of other tools I used. Specifically though: they expose the DMP features that some other companies price into oblivion and enterprise levels (if the other tools have them at all!) I feel like I've gushed a lot about the DMP and power user features of Convert …  Lukas B. Snelling Founder & President Chose Convert Experiences Convert is better vs. Optimizely and VWO for the following reasons:
 Auke Vos Owner Chose Convert Experiences The biggest point for Convert Experiences is definitely the price and the completeness of their packages. Their Magento plugin makes it great for running tests on ecommerce stores. One thing that's missing for me is deeper insights into revenue (something optimizely does …  David Fein Community/UX Strategist Chose Convert Experiences Convert works similar to Optimizely, but at a more competitive rate.  Francis Teo Founder and eCommerce Conversions Strategist Chose Convert Experiences Visual Website Optimizer's feature set is not as well suited to advanced experiments (it doesn't seem to allow direct editing of variation code). Optimizely is expensive and their agency plan requires a 12 month minimum contract. Support is not as great. Optimizely also does …  Kaitlyn Greene Optimization Specialist & Website Manager Chose Convert Experiences While Optimizely is an amazing A/B testing tool, Convert has almost the exact same offerings but at a much lower cost. The customer and technical support are excellent as well, and Dennis's insights and strategy calls are very helpful.  Joshua Uebergang Head of Strategy Chose Convert Experiences Visual Website Optimizer costs too much and misses a lot of transactions due to third-party cookies. Optimizely flat out refused to support Shopify. They withdrew their app from the marketplace in 2014. |
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing and Experimentation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Audience Segmentation & Targeting |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results and Analysis |
|
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Convert Experiences Score 9.9 out of 10 |  Google Content Experiments (discontinued) Score 7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Contentsquare Score 7.2 out of 10 |  Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Contentsquare Score 7.2 out of 10 | Dynamic Yield Score 8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 (0 ratings) | 9.9 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.8 (0 ratings) |
| Bannersnack | Convert Experiences | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
Scot Chandler Senior Consultant |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
Auke Vos Owner |
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Ken Hanson Growth Lead |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
Art Bukowski CRO, UX and GA specialist |
| Alternatives Considered | |
Matt Beischel Founder & CEO |
| Return on Investment |
|
Scot Chandler Senior Consultant |
| ScreenShots | Convert Experiences Screenshots      |