Barracuda Application Protection vs. Azure Front Door

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Barracuda Application Protection
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Barracuda Application Protection is a cloud-delivered application security service that includes full-spectrum L3-L7 DDoS protection (volumetric and application) to protect applications from disruptions and ensure nonstop availability.N/A
Azure Front Door
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Front Door is a cloud content delivery network (CDN) service that helps users deliver high performance, scalability, and a secure user experiences for content and applications. It includes a customizable rules engine for advanced routing capabilities. It boasts instant scalability with global HTTP load balancing and failover.
$35
per month
Pricing
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$35
per month
Premium
$330
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBase fees (Billed hourly and only for number of hours used)​
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Considered Both Products
Barracuda Application Protection
Chose Barracuda Application Protection
-Easier to deploy
-Less costly
-Support is extraordinary
Chose Barracuda Application Protection
Price for the over all functionalities offered.
Simplicity to configure and deploy in our current environment.
Automated standard policies.
Chose Barracuda Application Protection
Using the phishing and impersonation tool to rule out and capture phishing emails is good one we are using.
Azure Front Door
Chose Azure Front Door
It's generally hard to compare CDNs, each has its features, POP locations, latency, and availability. We have used many other CDNs, including Akamai, Verizon, and CloudFlare. They are all great, but each has its own advantages/disadvantages. From our perspective, all other …
Best Alternatives
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.3 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.3 out of 10
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Barracuda Application ProtectionAzure Front Door
Likelihood to Recommend
Good in providing threat protection especially our emails that come in from the outside. Capturing potential spam and malware from emails from outside our network has been good. Keeps us alert for anything coming in from the outside that could compromise our network.
Read full review
Azure Front Door is very easy and fast to set up and implement, if you are looking for an easy solution that is secure and reliable, Front Door does all that and can be configured in a few hours. AFD is a CDN with WAF, accordingly, it is well suited for any CDN Scenario, other providers such as Akamai or Verizon have a more expensive base price and are harder to manage/configure, Front Door is simple, easy, and provides what's needed when it comes to Web App Security. If you have multiple data centers, have apps in different regions, or targeting a global audience, AFD is an excellent option to get up to speed quickly. If you are looking for more features and capabilities, or planning a very complex setup, Front Door might be sufficient, but other specialized provides such as Imperva, Cloudflare or Akamai are generally a bit more advanced (but harder to set up and maintain). It always depends on the scenario, but for us, Front Door was an excellent option and served us very well with no issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Automated policies
  • Easy to use
  • Identification of known attacks
  • Straight forward configuration
Read full review
  • Content delivery across all continents
  • Web & media acceleration
  • Web application firewall
  • Backend geo-availability
  • Reporting & access metrics
Read full review
Cons
  • More innovative solutions for sniffing more on the network.
  • Have the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion.
Read full review
  • Better control over origin caching
  • Hierarchal Management UI instead of distributed management
  • TLS & Cipher Control
  • Faster publishing or change updates
Read full review
Usability
-Easy to deploy -Easy to manage application -Scalability is good -Security Features contains a lot of granularities especially URL profiles protection and Json security
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Price for the over all functionalities offered. Simplicity to configure and deploy in our current environment. Automated standard policies. easy to maintain.
Read full review
It's generally hard to compare CDNs, each has its features, POP locations, latency, and availability. We have used many other CDNs, including Akamai, Verizon, and Cloudflare. They are all great, but each has its own advantages/disadvantages. From our perspective, all other providers were much harder to configure and maintain and their overall cost was higher than AFD. For example, Verizon was great, performance was excellent, but reporting/logging was not up to our expectations, and we had many issues with its Rules Engine. AFD is great for delivering your web apps globally quickly and easily, the cost is reasonable and comes with very little operational overhead, the logging and reporting capabilities are very good, additionally, its integration with Azure Cloud Services gives it an advantage over other competitors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Implementing Barracuda Application Protection has had a measurable and strategic impact on our overall business objectives. Within the first 6 months of deployment, I saw a 53% reduction in security incidents affecting the web applications, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response
  • Cloud migration was so fast and give a head start and provides a competitive advantage in deploying new services faster than anticipated.
Read full review
  • AFD implementation was approx. 80% cheaper than other providers, from initiation to operation.
  • It allowed us to minimize backend resources size/processing power, taking all the load from client requests, cutting tens of thousands of dollars monthly on compute, memory, and network bandwidth.
  • Overall, the ROI of AFD is very quick, it is not an expensive solution, therefore, its ROI goals are easy to calculate and achieve, our overall ROI exceeded 300%.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Barracuda Application Protection Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of