Beeceptor is a no-code Service Virtualization platform for all kinds of HTTP services including REST APIs, SOAP & GraphQL. It can be used to create mock server, define service behaviors in a few seconds, and simulate services without writing any code. Beeceptor features include a realtime traffic inspection, rule-based mocking, stateful mocks, and flexible environment switching. Beeceptor simplifies service mocking, and debugging, and shifts-left the software development. It's an affordable…
N/A
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
Pricing
Beeceptor
BlazeMeter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Beeceptor
BlazeMeter
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Beeceptor is available in both cloud-based and on-premise editions, offering flexible deployment options tailored to your organization's unique needs. It has successfully met rigorous security standards by achieving SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance. For more information on pricing, and to request a comprehensive data sheet, please get in touch with our team.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Beeceptor
BlazeMeter
Considered Both Products
Beeceptor
No answer on this topic
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)