BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, powered by PowerBroker and Avecto reduces the risk of privilege abuse by eliminating unnecessary privileges, and can elevate rights to Windows, Mac, Unix, Linux and network devices without hindering productivity.N/A
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive, cloud-managed endpoint security solution designed to protect devices from advanced malware and cyber threats throughout the entire attack lifecycle—before, during, and after an attack. It offers powerful prevention capabilities to identify and stop threats before they compromise your systems, using multifaceted techniques including risk-based vulnerability management and posture assessments. The solution provides deep visibility and advanced detection…N/A
Pricing
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Considered Both Products
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Chose BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
We felt that BT PM was easier to use and a better fit for us than CyberArk was. It was a bit confusing and the UI wasn't as friendly.
Chose BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is a easy solution to deploy and manage. Moreover they are able to manage Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac OS with a single solution and a single way to manage policies.
The auto update feature with the packager is also a really important …
Chose BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management has more features than CyberArk and more detailed options for configurations. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is more focused on setting up access-related endpoints, which requires some fine tuning and understanding for use …
Chose BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
n/a as we skipped doing a compare
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Webroot Antivirus + Internet Security Complete (SecureAnywhere) and Veem
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Integration with the rest of the Cisco security stack made Cisco Secure Endpoint the right product.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Microsoft Defender XDR
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Because of the Cisco ecosystem
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint is easier to deploy and use versus Trend Micro Deep Security. The interface is less intuitive (possibly subjective) when compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which required more training for support staff. Also the integration is not as good with Trend. …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike.

I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint provides better overall support and detection compared to other products used. Strong visibility and a strong range of tools when researching an issue to find either information or resolution. Dashboards are also a lot cleaner than most products and easier …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
I was not part of the selection process but know this was purchased on a suite of tools. We get so much more from MDE, CSE doesn’t compare.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Best tool if you have a heavy Cisco product suite for Intergrations. Send data to our SIEM (QRADAR) well and is easy to deploy with our SCCM. The groups and polices are helpful to customize protection for different endpoint needs.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Huntress is evaluating endpoints from a different perspective. SentinelOne would be an alternative product. Cisco Secure Endpoint always shows up reasonably close to SentinelOne in overall protection. SentinelOne does offer a SOC option which dramatically adds to the …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
No participate of the selection
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint provides much more protection, reporting, and features than Microsoft defender did for us.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Compared to most competitors, Cisco Secure Endpoint is affordable and offers better protection in features.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint works in tandem with Cisco Umbrella, which allows to even further improve the overall security of the systems.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
We were using McAfee but the performance was not good and it consume a high memory. Cisco secure endpoint is very advanced and very lightweight for organizations. The configuration and management are very easy and centralized.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
The integration with all the other Cisco platforms made AMP a clear front-runner. Crowdstrike and Sophos had no integration at all and Palo Alto required their firewalls be deployed. Again, as a Cisco Security customer, it made complete sense to leverage their AMP technology.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Compared to Malwarebytes Enterprise, AMP is significantly harder to configure, update, implement, use. The overall burden that AMP puts on the IT department is rather high.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint is an advanced EDR solution that is highly effective and scalable. Our experience previously with MalwareBytes and Microsoft Defender was not horrible, but these products were not as effective and did not integrate well with our other security products to …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints is one of a wide spectrum of Cisco security products and is the first step that can bring you to start using Cisco AnyConnect and Cisco ISE to integrate with them.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit.
Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
AMP is truly an advanced product offering much better protection and actionable information on your environment.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
AMP is far superior to Symantec in my opinion. It is much more robust and customizable. It is much easier to manage systems and to spot trouble areas. Deploying and upgrading clients is much simpler. It is a much more lightweight client on the desktop. Overall a much better …
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
Although is kinda expensive AMP has been our only choice because of the integration with other products like Umbrella.
Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint
When looking for a Malware Protection for Endpoints, AMP was our first and only choice. We like the fact that Cisco has a whole line of security software that can work together and so our goal has been to use the Cisco Suite that includes Umbrella, Firepower, AMP. We are very …
Features
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
-
Ratings
Cisco Secure Endpoint
7.3
Ratings
16% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege ManagementCisco Secure Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
It is an absolute must in all organizations where security is taken seriously. For organizations where there is a tendency among the users' end to abuse access privileges, this tool comes in handy. It has features that would enable the administrator to look through video logs to see what was done by a specific user. Also has the capability to terminate or lock users/ user sessions.
Read full review
Cisco Secure Endpoint is well suited for keeping track of the many different and points that we have in our organization. All of these devices can easily be monitored with Cisco Secure Endpoint. It can monitor our servers and our desktops and laptops in our environment. It isn’t as appropriate for our student devices. However, those aren’t as critical since they are just Chromebooks.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allow applications updates without IT need
  • Block dangerous applications
  • Block unknown applications
  • Elevate some windows basic function as installing local printer
Read full review
  • Threat identification: it finds things we wouldn't have even been looking for.
  • Integration with Secure Malware Analytics for automatic submission of suspicious files.
  • In-depth and complex configuration options for finely tuned policies for different users and endpoints.
  • Part of the Cisco Secure Client product for easier distribution and reduction of running agents on end-user devices
  • Integrates with Secure-X for single-pane of glass view of dashboards.
Read full review
Cons
  • Better communication to customers on new release compatibility
  • Crowd-sourced rule logic for specific applications would be nice (I hear underway)
  • Technical support processes could be a bit improved
Read full review
  • The update mechanism of the client is not obvious and takes some finesse to learn
  • The clients auto update signatures, but not agents which I have seen lead to mixed version levels as it is harder to keep up with
  • It is generally a challenge to manage the licenses and if you let the license lapse, it is a very bad thing in my opinion.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
the renewal must be studied with different factors
Read full review
Usability
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is really usable thanks to the Cloud platform that provide central management, analytics, updates and policy definitions. For policies, quickstart covers around 80% of the overall configuration and we just have to define home made applications and dedicated use cases. From the user perspective, messages can be customized so it's easy to understand for user and they have an endpoint application to follow workflows approval.
Read full review
AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We've had no availability issues.
Read full review
no complain and no issue with availability
Read full review
Performance
We've had no performance issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The product performed to the level of our requirements.
Read full review
In terms of technical support for Cisco Secure Endpoint, the support has been pretty good. All the cases I submitted were solved in a reasonable time frame, and it was a good experience. However, I find that not as many vendors have the expertise I would expect.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The in person training was great. Very informative and the trainer was great. I would highly recommend this option if you're hesitant. Any questions can then be directed to support. Support is great as well, and will definitely help answer any questions. I would definitely
recommend adding some type of training as it was very helpful for our
staff.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
It was informative and very helpful. They provide a lot of courses that give you exactly what is needed to manage the product. Any questions can then be directed to support. I would definitely recommend adding some type of training as it was very helpful for our staff. The online training sufficed for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
BeyondTrust was super helpful with implementation and it only took a few weeks to get it up and running.
Read full review
no participation in implementation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management has more features than CyberArk and more detailed options for configurations. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is more focused on setting up access-related endpoints, which requires some fine tuning and understanding for use cases where a single endpoint has to be shared with multiple vendors. CyberArk's setup is more geared to users' accounts and then endpoint management under the user accounts.
Read full review
Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements that come into play, we're benefiting from them. We're benefiting from the Telos threat intel, which is really good as well
Read full review
Scalability
It's very easy to deploy with minimal interruption.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We are able to securely monitor activity from vendors accessing our network.
  • This meets our cybersecurity objectives of securing our OT networks.
  • The benefits far outweigh the initial cost of the software.
Read full review
  • It ensures minimal spread of cyber threats in case of infiltration thanks to containment response capabilities.
  • By keeping our endpoints threat-proof, our systems and devices run efficiently hence better productivity.
  • It frees IT staff thanks to its automation and ability to keep threats away with minimal intervention.
Read full review
ScreenShots