TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Bitbucket Server (discontinued) vs. GitHub

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

29 Reviews and Ratings

GitHub

1,099 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

    Score6 out of 10
    		N/ABitbucket Server (formerly Stash) from Atlassian was a self-hosted source code management solution. The product is no longer available for sale, and support for existing licenses ended in 2024.N/A

    GitHub

    Score9 out of 10
    		N/AGitHub is a platform that hosts public and private code and provides software development and collaboration tools. Features include version control, issue tracking, code review, team management, syntax highlighting, etc. Personal plans ($0-50), Organizational plans ($0-200), and Enterprise plans are available.

    $4

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitHub
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Team
    $40
    per year per user
    Enterprise
    $210
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitHub
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitHub
    Considered Both Products
    Discontinued Products
    Verified User
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    We migrated several of our applications to BitBucket from legacy Team Foundation Server, and the experience has been significantly better. It's easy to use and plenty flexible. Other solutions such as GitHub are also good, but we needed to keep everything on-prem due to …
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    We started off with Apache Subversion (SVN) and moved over to Git (supported via Bitbucket) as Git itself has started to become the new industry norm. The pull request feature allows developers to perform code reviews without needing another code review application. We settled …
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    If you are selecting a product to use and you are not currently using version control, it may be in your best interest to choose another tool. Bitbucket Server is not as feature rich and doesn't feel as mature as some other platforms and arguably, with the lost production from …
    Incentivized
    Dane Allen
    Software Developer, Xactware Solutions, Inc. in Engineering at Verisk Insurance Solutions (Insurance, 1001-5000 employees)
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Stash works better for hosting large repositories used across an enterprise.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    Stash was selected before I was at the company, but we're looking at these alternatives and actively considering switching. Stash seems to have all the necessary features we need to make it work, but it doesn't have any bells and whistles or extra special features that we can …
    Incentivized
    Darian Rawson
    Senior Designer in Information Technology at Eview 360 (Design, 11-50 employees)
    Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    It can be daunting to set up a Git server for a developer. Managing it can be more time consuming than you want it to be. Stash helps you out by handling what you likely need. If you are already a Git pro, you won't need it, but our team loves the simplicity that Stash brings …
    Incentivized
    GitHub
    Brett Knighton
    Development Team Lead in Engineering at Xactware (Insurance, 1001-5000 employees)
    Chose GitHub
    GitHub isn't the primary repository management tool that we use. It is a good tool and is well suited for certain types of teams. It has many great tools built-in and is easy to use. But, we primarily use Bitbucket and are moving over to Azure DevOps. So, we didn't "select" …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitHub
    Version Control Software Features
    Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Bitbucket Server (discontinued) and GitHub
    Feature
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    GitHub
    7.9
    2 Ratings
    Branching and Merging00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Version History00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
    Pull Requests00 Ratings9.72 Ratings
    Code Review Tools00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
    Project Access Control00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
    Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings7.42 Ratings
    Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings4.12 Ratings
    Branch Protection00 Ratings9.42 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitHub
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    9.0
    (123 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.8
    (26 ratings)