Bitdefender GravityZone vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Bitdefender GravityZone

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Bitdefender GravityZone	Score9.1 out of 10	N/A	Bitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints.	$149 per month 5 devices (minimum)
Kaspersky Endpoint Security	Score7.8 out of 10	N/A	Kaspersky Small Office Security (formerly Kaspersky Work Space Security) is antivirus / endpoint security software from Russian company Kaspersky.	$29.99 per month

Pricing

Bitdefender GravityZone

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

GravityZone Small Business Security: $284.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security: $369.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security Premium: $814.99
per year 10 devices
GravityZone Business Security Premium: Contact Sales
GravityZone Business Security Enterprise: Contact Sales
GravityZone XDR: Contact Sales

Essential Suite: $29.99
per month
Advanced Suite: $39.99
per month
Premium Suite: $44.99
per month

Pricing Offerings
Bitdefender GravityZone	Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

5 device license purchase minimum. Discounts available for multi-year subscriptions. 1st year discounts available (up to 30% off displayed price).

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Bitdefender GravityZone	Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Considered Both Products	Bitdefender Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone We switched from Kaspersky Endpoint Security to BitDefender, due to public perception, monthly pricing model and centralized management across multi-tenant. We then switched from BitDefender to Webroot as this product had the same features as BitDefender as well as better Apple … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Bitdefender offered the largest number of tools with the smallest footprint of any providers we have tested and used. The cloud platform is very well thought out and will give us all the information we need very quickly. Resources required have been greatly reduced, both on … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Very effective. If we would've stayed with Kaspersky, we would've gotten infected by ransomware. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone It's night and day between Kaspersky and Bitdefender [GravityZone]. We previously used Kaspersky both internally and throughout our customer base. It was a resource hog and allowed many threats to get through. It never updated properly and was in my opinion, a piece of junk. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone We tested many different antivirus programs before deciding to go with Bitdefender GravityZone. Bitdefender [GravityZone] caught numerous threats that made it through the other AVs. It also uses considerably fewer system resources than its competitors. Incentivized Helpful? Michael Kerzner Lead Systems Engineer in Information Technology at Nettology, LLC (Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone We were a Kaspersky shop for years. Kaspersky was a resource hog and it didn't even block half of what was thrown at it. We had more outbreaks and more end-user complaints in a year of Kaspersky then we have had in almost three years of Bitdefender. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone I believe it’s pretty effective compared to others. Bitdefender GravityZone does have robust protection. Having used Carbon Black and Kaspersky, all solutions are pretty reliable and top tier. Incentivized Helpful? Chris Thompson IT Director in Information Technology at PEACE, Inc. (Non-profit Organization Management, 201-500 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Bitdefender GravityZone is easier to use compared to other platforms. I found others to be convoluted in their program management features. Incentivized Helpful? Craig Roberts President & CEO in Information Technology at Roberts IT Consulting, Inc. (Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Bitdefender is as good, if not better, than any other endpoint security solution that we've evaluated. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Bitdefender GravityZone We switched from Kaspersky due to cloud management and license deployment. It was not easy to renew licenses or upgrade the software. Incentivized Helpful? Carol Heim Network Administrator in Information Technology at Sisters of the Presentation (Religious Institutions, 51-200 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Norton and Symantec seemed to attract every hacker and spammer in our opinion. Kaspersky was difficult to manage thru the cloud access. All 3 of these products used a large portion of the computer resources and had many of our users locked up during scans. We always seemed to … Incentivized Helpful? Dan Gospe Chief Operating Officer, and HIPAA Privacy Officer in Information Technology at dmi Networking (Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone Bitdefender has better results than most of the others. As to why it won against Kaspersky, it is because the dashboard is easier to manage. Incentivized Helpful? John Hallenberger Systems Administrator / Project Leader in Information Technology at Fox C-6 Schools (Education Management, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Bitdefender GravityZone We have looked at Kaspersky several times but have always decided the client to heavy and management was cumbersome at best. We used Avast Business Antivirus for about 5 years primarily because it was free for education and we had ESET before that. Overall Bitdefender is easier … Incentivized Helpful?	Kaspersky Lab Karen Thompson Systems Analyst in Information Technology at Mid-sized company in the Mid-Atlantic (Automotive, 501-1000 employees) Chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security I've used the cloud version of CarbonBlack and Bitdefender. They both say they automatically scan files as soon as they appear on your computer. The user/administrator is left to trust that the technology works. With Bitdefender, it at least allows an on-demand scan, but it … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Bitdefender GravityZone

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Bitdefender GravityZone and Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Feature	Bitdefender GravityZone 9.6 60 Ratings	Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.3 13 Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.556 Ratings	9.013 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	10.056 Ratings	8.013 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.060 Ratings	8.012 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	10.039 Ratings	7.09 Ratings
Infection Remediation	9.555 Ratings	8.013 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	10.054 Ratings	9.013 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.560 Ratings	9.013 Ratings

User Ratings
	Bitdefender GravityZone	Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (69 ratings)	9.0 (26 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (2 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (4 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	5.6 (54 ratings)	8.5 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

Bitdefender GravityZone vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Bitdefender GravityZone

Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons