BitLocker Drive Encryption vs. Thales Network Encryptors

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BitLocker
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's BitLocker is an endpoint encryption option.
$100
One Time Fee
Thales Network Encryptors
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Thales FIPS-certified network encryption devices are designed to offer the ideal solution for data-in-motion security, including time-sensitive voice and video streams, for enterprise, and government organizations.N/A
Pricing
BitLocker Drive EncryptionThales Network Encryptors
Editions & Modules
Windows 10 Home
$100.00
One Time Fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitLockerThales Network Encryptors
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitLocker Drive EncryptionThales Network Encryptors
User Ratings
BitLocker Drive EncryptionThales Network Encryptors
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitLocker Drive EncryptionThales Network Encryptors
Likelihood to Recommend
It can be used if you are already familiar with other Microsoft System Center tools, it will provide integration and it will be easy to use from an Administrator's perspective. However, if you want more detailed information related to the troubleshooting, specific fields, or data, it will not be that granular.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • It is fairly easy to use, from both a technician and users point of view. The install itself is pretty simple, and setup of the software is also fairly simple. For users, it is easy to use the software to encrypt the computer.
  • It doesn't seem to use a whole lot of system resources when the encryption is enabled on the computer. You shouldn't experience any slowness of the computer, other than the time it takes to first encrypt the computer.
  • It serves its main purpose very well, and that is to protect computers from intrusions/data breaches. It is particularly good for protecting computers that are accessing/storing sensitive/confidential data.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Even if it's the best we tested, I think write performance could be improved. Maybe with dedicated hardware inside the TPM?
  • No integration with OS password is a shame as most others have it and it is Microsoft on Microsoft so they can probably do it better then anyone else and safer.
  • I wish they would support multiple passwords like FileVault on macOS. If it's a shared computer, you have to give the only password to Bitlocker to both users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Very easy to enable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Not good nor bad, BitLocker encryption is a symptom of our era, we need to protect ourselves and our data, BitLocker is a tool, as an IT we have to deal with it but it doesn't bring any benefit to my daily operations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
This was formerly called Symantec PGP encryption. We selected BitLocker since this is what the University has deployed and is currently supporting. BitLocker has many advantages over Symantec PGP, as BitLocker is built-into all Windows computers. With PGP, this was a commercial product that had to be installed on each machine. That product also was not as easy or intuitive to use as BitLocker, and there were also more issues/problems that occasionally occurred with PGP.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Protects against data loss and theft, which can be very expensive if PII, SPI, PHI is involved. Fines for this type of loss can be very high, along with the costs of notification, and discovery.
  • Cost is included in Windows O/S, without needing additional licensing costs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots