TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. mabl

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
mabl
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
mabl is a regression test automation tool with test output visualization and performance regression for tracking the perceived speed of web apps and sites, from the company of the same name in Boston.N/A
Pricing
BlazeMetermabl
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMetermabl
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMetermabl
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
mabl
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Chose mabl
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the …
Features
BlazeMetermabl
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BlazeMeter
-
Ratings
mabl
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BlazeMetermabl
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMetermabl
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMetermabl
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Pros
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
  • Organization - labels and flows make this easy
  • Customer support!
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Cons
  • It required good knowledge to analyze BlazeMeter report.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
ScreenShots

mabl Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing the login flow of the Freshbooks web application. Each test step is created by interacting with your application and is recorded in the mabl Trainer.Screenshot of Parameterized JavaScript enables everyone to contribute to building automated tests.Screenshot of View of mabl's insights and reporting. In this view, we're looking at mabl's release coverage dashboard, which includes passing rate, quality metrics, and more.Screenshot of Quickly create Jira tickets directly from test failures. All of the test execution data will be automatically pulled into the issue in Jira.Screenshot of Setting up a test as a part of your workflow in GitHub Actions.