TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Formerly from Micro Focus, a centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Chris Trimper | TrustRadius Reviewer
Chris Trimper
Enterprise QA Test Automation Architect
Chose OpenText UFT Digital Lab
We selected UFT Mobile mainly for its easy tie-in to our existing automation and other tools we use from Micro Focus. We did briefly look at some other options, but the ability to instantly tie in, and also allow future changes (if we desired) like Appium.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OpenText UFT Digital Lab
HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with HP ALM and HP UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon …
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterOpenText UFT Digital Lab
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
It is well suited for companies which has geographically dispersed teams and limited devices in library. HP Mobile Center provides maximum usage of available devices on onsite, near shore and offshore models. It has distributed architecture which is very useful if your team must need physical access to device.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Management of the various devices.
  • Management of various versions and installation of our application.
  • Allow real device interactions like Biometrics.
  • Simple to use interface for any manual tester.
  • Works in any browser.
  • Easy management of signed/packaged apps in Android and iOS.
Chris Trimper | TrustRadius Reviewer
Chris Trimper
Enterprise QA Test Automation Architect
Read full review
Cons
  • It required good knowledge to analyze BlazeMeter report.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • I would like to see stability in connection for connected devices in case of network failure, reboots and restarts
  • I would like to see shorter support cycle for patch and updates from OS makers
  • I would like to see a dedicated HPMC support center, where users can call-in and get answers as this a brand new product.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The tool continues to meet our expectations and has shown that they are continually evolving the product with new features that benefit us. The most recent new feature was the auto-signing/packaging of iOS apps from the server to allow native interaction of features like biometrics. Prior this was a lengthy exercise.
Chris Trimper | TrustRadius Reviewer
Chris Trimper
Enterprise QA Test Automation Architect
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with HP ALM and HP UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon Device Library.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Efficient use of the devices. Reduced the idle time.
  • Better control over access and user management. Testing within our controlled environments.
  • Better control of device matrix.
  • Faster testing cycles. Early design bugs to development teams. Real devices means, less guess work.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots