The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
RPA Suite
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Rigel Technologies headquartered in Madrid offers their RPA Suite, a customized RPA solution solution designed for enterprises to support interoperability and compatibility with existing corporate applications. It can be programmed in C #, Java, .Net, Visual Studio, Visual Basic, C ++, Delphi, is optionally cloud-hosted by the vendor, and it can be used to add to the existing capabilities of Visual Studio.
$0
2 bots, 90 days, 20 process hours/month
Pricing
BlazeMeter
RPA Suite
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
Free trial
$0
2 bots, 90 days, 20 process hours/month
Pay per use
$3,360
(yearly) 10 bots, 1 RPA Center seat, 280 process hours/month
Start Up
$3,500
(yearly) 2 bots, 1 RPA Center, unlimited process hours
SME
$6,500
(yearly) 5 bots, 1 RPA Center, unlimited process hours
Business
$15,500
(yearly) 10 bots, 2 RPA Center seats + 1 supervisor seat + 16 h support, 2 RPA Developer seats + 2 development bots, certification for 2 developers + 2 analysts, unlimited process hours
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeter
RPA Suite
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
All RPA-Suite licensing modes are floating. Only active robots consume licensing time, so idle robots do not count for timed options. A company may have more installed robots than those currently running a function.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeter
RPA Suite
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)