TrustRadius

BlazeMeter vs. TestDrive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BlazeMeter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is a unified, end-to-end, next-generation software test automation platform built for both Agile and COE teams, from Perforce. BlazeMeter includes complete continuous testing capabilities deeply integrated into a single, intuitive workflow.
$149
per month
TestDrive
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
TestDrive offers end-to-test automation across browsers, client/server, and legacy applications, Windows GUI, Java, SAP, Salesforce or anything, without the need for high-cost, specialized automation engineers. 100% code-free Patented user annotation thinks as a user does Self-healing minimizes maintenance Automatic synchronization -including over single page web apps Cross-browser testing at the click of a button, even true of the previously difficult to automate, single page…N/A
Pricing
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149.00
per month
Pro
$649.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Considered Both Products
BlazeMeter
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
In comparison with Blazemeter the closes competitor is JMeter but it has disadvantages like it is not a tool that can be use as a collaborative tool and works locally in a computer, Blazemeter is in the web so different people can access and run tests or collaborate do add, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter integrates better with a continuous delivery pipeline than SOASTA did.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BlazeMeter
Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.
TestDrive
Chose TestDrive
We have not tried other similar products so it is difficult to say, but we definitely enjoy this product and the support team to work with.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestDrive
TestDrive is an automated quality assessment tool that is designed not only to test software but client/server-side legacy applications. We use this tool to run tests for GUI enhancement. Its adaptable script technology helps us to run existing testing scripts over updated …
Best Alternatives
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BlazeMeterTestDrive
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
It is well suited for any testing and running scripts easily. You do not need a programming background to be able to utilize the software.
GH
Read full review
Pros
  • Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
  • Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Easy automation.
  • Great customer service.
  • Easy script running.
  • Relatively easy to implement.
GH
Read full review
Cons
  • It required good knowledge to analyze BlazeMeter report.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Not suitable for small applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BlazeMeter scores well against Apache JMeter in one Key point , the load generation from different cloud based systems. This helps to measure the capacity of the the application in a transparent way and not bogged down by the capacity of the system from where the test is executed (in this case Apache JMeter)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
TestDrive is an automated quality assessment tool that is designed not only to test software but client/server-side legacy applications. We use this tool to run tests for GUI enhancement. Its adaptable script technology helps us to run existing testing scripts over updated versions of the applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • BlazeMerter helped performance tests run on their cloud, thereby diminishing our on-prem setup costs tremendously.
  • BlazeMeter pings our application from several geographical locations, thereby simulating real life users.
  • BlazeMeter offers dedicated IPs so that firewall issues can be bypassed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
  • Thanks to TestDrive, our automation is always ready to run, and the script maintenance lag is removed, testing can go ahead, and issues are found quicker.
  • We no longer worry about varying response times for the application, nor do we no need to code "timing loops" to check if the application is in the right state.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots