BlazeMeter vs. Testlum

It is well suited for applications that are mission-critical or applications that can receive high traffic/transactions at unscheduled time periods. Using the load testing feature of BlazeMeter, we can test and ascertain the capacity of the application without the drawbacks of the usual Apache JMeter load testing which depends heavily on the host system from where the load testing is performed.

Incentivized

Testlum is particularly well-suited for automating regression and functional testing in projects with a well-defined structure. For example, we’ve effectively used it to automate all testing processes for our education platform. Its unlimited integration capabilities and that we could add custom integrations helped us a lot. We’ve found that Testlum provides great support for all testing needs, and we have no problems maintaining test stability.

• Results are easy to read
• Tests can be run easily
• Tests can ben imported easily from jMeter

Incentivized

• BlazeMeter should not require the purchase of 2 dedicated IPs for each suite of performance tests.
• BlazeMeter should make custom packages cheaper than they are today when purchased for an enterprise and should include dedicated IPs in the package.
• BlazeMerer should have integration with Jenkins Pipeline 2.0.

Incentivized

We would like to share a good experience using Testlum

Personally, I prefer using JMeter + Redline13, however we had some business folks that wanted to be able to run a few of their own tests. The non-technical individuals preferred to use Blazemeter because of its simple and intuitive UI.

Incentivized

Due to the fact that Testlum is a low-code tool, which really makes it easier to work with it. It was also a recommendation from our partners.

• It helped positively by helping to identify the maximum capacity needed for high traffic periods
• Saved revenue by eliminating unwanted duplication of systems

Incentivized