Bloomberg Terminal vs. Factiva

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bloomberg Terminal
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Sitting on the desks of 325,000 of the world’s most influential decision makers, the Bloomberg Terminal is a modern icon of financial markets. Launched in 1981, long before PCs and the internet became ubiquitous, the Bloomberg Terminal connected market participants to data, analytics and information-delivery service.N/A
Factiva
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Factiva from Dow Jones is a data service that helps companies identify opportunities, accelerate decisions and manage a business's reputation, that includes global news and data accessible via the Dow Jones' research platform, on mobile devices or integrated via advanced feeds and APIs.N/A
Pricing
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Considered Both Products
Bloomberg Terminal
Chose Bloomberg Terminal
While there are a lot of competitive services in the marketplace, each good in its own right, the Bloomberg Terminal is considered the top product. It has key fast information and can help individuals make fast decisions. It also has a top-tier support desk that can answer …
Factiva
Chose Factiva
Each of the tools I have described share the same kind of premise: the main thing they do is source and collect media content. Then to varying degrees they run filters against this content and produce a range of data visualisations and ways of slicing the data and content. …
Chose Factiva
I have used Lexis Nexus and Thomson One. I find Factiva to be the most user friendly of these services. I much prefer Factiva's layout on their website when I search for articles and I also prefer its search builder over Lexis Nexus and Thomson One.
Chose Factiva
I often used Twitter as an alternative to Factiva. Additionally, I used a number of link-gathering resources such as Google alerts.
Chose Factiva
At the time, Factiva was already being used by the company I worked for - they had developed procedures specifically for using Factiva, so there wasn't really an option. I've used Lexis, Westlaw and Bloomberg exclusively for legal research, so there wasn't really an overlap …
Best Alternatives
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
S&P Capital IQ
S&P Capital IQ
Score 8.2 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
S&P Capital IQ
S&P Capital IQ
Score 8.2 out of 10
D&B Hoovers
D&B Hoovers
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bloomberg TerminalFactiva
Likelihood to Recommend
Depending on which area of the finance sector you may work in, the Bloomberg Terminal will have plenty of helpful functionality for you. Two specific scenarios for myself in the Structured Finance area are tracking the pricing benchmark and following outstanding deals in the market. You can follow progress of the deals, how well they are advancing, and final pricing details
Read full review
Factiva is particularly useful when I work on securities litigations involving shareholder lawsuits -- i.e. shareholders who bought and sold shares during a specified class period when the company was misrepresenting, for example, its financials. Specifically Factiva is quite useful in helping me understand what company events were known by the market and when they were known. Factiva has also been useful in helping me on various research studies. It is less relevant for other types of litigation that I work on (i.e. Patent litigation, etc).
Read full review
Pros
  • Communicating with investors, banks, partners, etc
  • Tracking key market metrics
  • Monitoring existing and previous structured finance deals
Read full review
  • Putting broad swaths of news in one place
  • Organizing information
  • Constant updates
Read full review
Cons
  • Visual user interface
  • A lot of functionality, need tutorials and lessons to narrow down
  • Expensive!
  • Some information may be delayed
Read full review
  • Lengthy setup for searches
  • Repeated articles appear frequently
  • Unannounced interface changes were unpleasant surprises
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
While there are a lot of competitive services in the marketplace, each good in its own right, the Bloomberg Terminal is considered the top product. It has key fast information and can help individuals make fast decisions. It also has a top-tier support desk that can answer questions for you and teach you functionality to apply to your role
Read full review
Each of the tools I have described share the same kind of premise: the main thing they do is source and collect media content. Then to varying degrees they run filters against this content and produce a range of data visualisations and ways of slicing the data and content. Factiva's strength lies more in the sourcing of content than in the manipulation of the results (much like the others do with more sophisticated dashboards and visual interpretations). We chose it because of the integrity of its sourcing breadth. It doesn't matter so much about the display of results because the source material you're working with isn't as dynamic as say social media.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Appropriate pricing of deals due to market comparisons
  • Instant communication with key stakeholders
  • Top and quick newsbreaks
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots