| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bluebeam | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Bluebeam Revu is a PDF management, control, and editing tool. It enables collaboration and markup within shared documents across projects’ life cycles and has takeoff and bid creation capabilities. | $240 per year per user |
 Revit | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Autodesk’s Revit is a Building Information Modelling (BIM) tool. It enables architectural, MEP, structural, and engineering design, and provides analysis to support iterative workflows | $350 per month |
| Bluebeam | Revit | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing available for monthly, annual, or 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer greater discounts. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bluebeam | Revit | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Bluebeam I haven’t spent enough time with Revit to give a full comparison. But three architects I’ve worked with have all said they enjoy both programs and Bluebeam was highly recommended for my needs in the company. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bluebeam PDF file sharing is really easy and simple, so users can markup and others can view them in real-time. Also, editing PDF files to crop, batch, remove, or replace pages is really efficient compared to Adobe Acrobat DC. Plus, the licensing fee is pretty small compared to Adobe … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bluebeam Much more complete than the competition. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bluebeam Bluebeam is a far superior product to Adobe. I don't even think they should be in the same category for anyone in the construction industry. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bluebeam Bluebeam Revu beats DWF review hand down. Bluebeam can communicate with any program that can create a PDF while DWF is exclusive to AutoDesk products thus forcing you to use a different software when working with other programs. The features of Bluebeam Revu compared to Adobe … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Revit Revit is great for documentation. I also use Rhino 3D for rapid prototype scenarios that can be imported in, but in the end everything should be documented in Revit because it really is easy. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Revit Revit is used primarily for creation of contract documents and documents that need to be used to build in the field. Sketch Up is great for a quick concept sketch, but lacks the details that Revit has which are needed to construct. AutoCAD is a great tool for details as well, … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Revit AutoCAD is great but it does not create sections and elevations while designing in 2D. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Revit Revit provides much more coordination between trades and the architects. Provides a better picture of how the designs are actually going to be constructed. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Revit Similar, early on ArchiCAD had a faster learning curve and a bit more rendering abilities for the early design. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Revit Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Bluebeam | Revit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction Project & Field Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimating |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human Resource Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bluebeam | Revit | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 1.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 1.0 | 7.0 |
| In-Person Training | - | 9.0 |
| Online Training | - | 5.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Configurability | - | 5.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 5.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.0 |
