Bluescape vs. Whiteboard.chat

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bluescape
Score 1.1 out of 10
N/A
Bluescape is a cloud-based, software as a service company based in Silicon Valley, CA, that provides a digital whiteboard of the same name.
$10
per user, per month (10-50 licenses)
Whiteboard.chat
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Whiteboard.chat – an interactive online whiteboard platform designed to support teaching and learning experiences, offering a free tier. Available to educators and students across the USA, the online whiteboard fosters collaborative, immersive learning environments and includes tools for real-time interaction, teachers engage, annotate, and instruct while students actively participate and learn.
$0
supported by ads (teacher boards only, 10 class boards)
Pricing
BluescapeWhiteboard.chat
Editions & Modules
Team
$10
per user, per month (10-50 licenses)
Business
$20
per user, per month (10+ licenses)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
10+ licenses
Educator Free
$0
supported by ads (teacher boards only, 10 class boards)
Starter
$3
per month
Basic
$7
per month
Gold
$15
per month
Schools/Districts
$150
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BluescapeWhiteboard.chat
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BluescapeWhiteboard.chat
User Ratings
BluescapeWhiteboard.chat
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BluescapeWhiteboard.chat
Likelihood to Recommend
This digital version of a pin-up space is absolutely an improvement to my workflow. The input is so robust. What you do with it is where the magic happens. This program is best suited for team collaboration. It helps to discuss how/where the team will contribute information to it--whether that is discussing the templates or a plan of action. Otherwise, the workspace can tend to get messy. I like the idea of having a presentation mode, where some of the markups could be hidden. The idea of a working session with consultants or clients sounds appealing, but at the same time, there is a desire for a cleaned up, clear shareout.
Read full review
Whenever the engineers & architects of my team require a brainstorming session, we normally use a whiteboard, as the enterprise does provide Miro licenses with associated. Hence, a whiteboard comes in handy when troubleshooting or discussing the requirements surrounding an application or technical infrastructure for a project. As it removes the dependency on requesting an additional Miro license, we use it. The board also loads faster than a Miro board.
Read full review
Pros
  • We have uploaded Ceros, PowerPoint, renderings and website links to our wall for new client presentations and they are always impressed with the technology.
  • Ceros is a pretty robust program that has links and different touch points and customers love clicking and scrolling through information posted.
  • We use one wall to post all of our customer boards so we can quickly jump into a different board and show new ideas or companies that we have done business with with a few quick swipes.
Read full review
  • Team collaboration feature where multiple users can contribute at the same time.
  • It has wide variety of tools that can be use for creative brainstorming.
  • Whiteboard.chat has no license cost associated with it.
Read full review
Cons
  • Chat function is less than ideal. It is easy to lose track of a conversation or a comment. We find making comments on the workspace turns out to be more effective.
  • Mentions--it would be nice to be able to assign groups within the people added to the workspace. Sometimes it'd be nice to do a quick mention with out having to do @everyone or type several names in (@person1, @person 2, etc.)
  • Infinite scalability
Read full review
  • The UI is lightweight and works well but can be more attractive.
  • The templates available are quite generic and basic; themed templates can be added.
  • Whiteboard navigation is mouse-dominated, but it also has too many hotkeys that make it confusing for the user. They can be easier.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The application, although it loads faster even at slower internet connections, and is a good alternative to Miro boards, still requires some more room for improvement. During live sessions, when multiple users contribute to the board, the updates are openly visible to all. Perhaps a privacy feature that hides text, available to the board admin, would allow me to give a rating. Being from an ersecurity background, I think the app also requires a secure sign-up process with MFA.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I've only used the Google one and the Microsoft one, and those have pretty limited features in comparison. The canvas size being huge is a great asset to me because nothing sucks more than when you literally can't fit your ideas on the canvas. Also the speed it updates and how easy it is to share around with people seems to be easier.
Read full review
I'd rate it lower than Miro but higher than draw.io and Lucidchart. The other two do not have a real-time collaborator feature for users; they have limited tools for designing and no provision for syncing with third-party apps. While whiteboard. Chat does provide a provision for the creation of JIRA or Azure DevOps tickets directly from a sticky note, like Miro.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I am only a user but my students see the value of the tool as it relates to their learning.
Read full review
  • Because the app is lightweight and less expensive, it loads faster, saving time in meetings and when sharing links.
  • Embeds easily with Confluence docs.
  • Templates are more simple and no variety needs some improvements.
  • Standardized custom templates are not saved; adding the save template feature would help.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bluescape Screenshots

Screenshot of Bluescape Collaborative Workspace

Whiteboard.chat Screenshots

Screenshot of