BMC AMI DevX vs. Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

BMC AMI DevX

BMC AMI DevX

18 Reviews and Ratings

Contact BMC AMI DevX

Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

1 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BMC AMI DevX	Score 9.4 out of 10	N/A	BMC AMI DevX is an integrated software platform that provides mainframe development teams with modern Application Development and DevOps capabilities. The solution connects traditional mainframe environments with contemporary development practices through components for source code management, testing, debugging, and analytics.	N/A
Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS	Score 10.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Matrix Requirements helps medical device companies to manage their design and quality system, offering products that manage medical device requirements, specifications, risks and tests ensuring full traceability and ensuring compliance regulations for quality systems. MatrixALM can be used to manage all design inputs and outputs in one place and makes it visible for the whole team at any time supporting any workflow: Waterfall, V-Model or Agile.	$500 per month per seat

Pricing

BMC AMI DevX

Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Matrix Essential: $500
per month per seat
Matrix Team: $750
per month per seat
Matrix Company: $1,145
per month per seat

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BMC AMI DevX	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

We also have an enterprise offering. Speak to our team to learn more!

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	BMC AMI DevX	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Considered Both Products	BMC AMI DevX SS Seitshiro Shole Tools System Engineer Chose BMC AMI DevX I guess it is a question of ease of use, easy to install, Vendor support Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX BMC AMI DevX wins by 33 lengths! Incentivized Helpful? JR Joseph Rohrbach Lead Application Developer Chose BMC AMI DevX The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX Does not apply. Incentivized Helpful? SZ Sean Zef Data Admin Chose BMC AMI DevX Optim is more user friendly in how it operates, in my opinion. It's less obtuse to figure out how to extract and mask the data required compared to File-AID. Further, Optim is easier to gather related tables, by far. I do prefer using File-AID via the Topaz GUI much more than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose BMC AMI DevX we used to use Compuware Strobe extensively to monitor performance Incentivized Helpful?	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	BMC AMI DevX	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Small Businesses	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitHub Score 9.0 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce P4 Score 7.6 out of 10	Polarion ALM Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BMC AMI DevX	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend	9.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.4 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BMC AMI DevX	Matrix Requirements ALM & QMS
Likelihood to Recommend	I love these tools! However, my company has not yet transitioned from SCLM to a modern repository, and this is causing most of our developers to remain within TSO for all their development. It's been a slow adoption up to this point, but we are moving toward more modernization this year and next, so with any luck, we'll see usage pick up. Success depends on the speed at which your management is willing to move. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Code Pipeline: integration of MF and non-MF type of object (COBOL, Java, zosconnect...). Deployment of objects coming from inside and outside the mainframe in the same way. Workbench for Eclipse: a must-have for working with Code Pipeline and the mainframe in the development context. Workbench for VS Code: They started developing VSCode, and the plugin works very well. There are a lot of things to add, but it's still very good. Young developers like it! Incentivized BE Benoit Ebner IBM z System engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Download source code plug-in on Azure DevOps to allow downloading prod version even if it's not in the assignment. Publishing Test Results on Azure DevOps from Total Test plugin Integration with DevEnterprise in Workbench and GenAI capabilities for enhance code analysis (Accross multiple programs/applications) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly. Incentivized SZ Sean Zef Data Admin Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. All of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Code Pipeline, however, stands head and shoulders above the rest in simplicity, completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and elegance. Incentivized JR Joseph Rohrbach Lead Application Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	I can debug (expeditor) much faster and more efficiently. In fact, I was asked yesterday to run their job through Workbench Expeditor. I can also view data movement much better. Code analysis lets me give a quicker explanation of what a program may do, as it provides a graphical interface showing processing and data movement. Incentivized BJ BRET JONES Sr Programmer Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	BMC AMI DevX Screenshots